Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard --skill implementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackbelttechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/implement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackbelttechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blackbelttechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/implement/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackbelttechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blackbelttechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/implement.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 10 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 30 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 35 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 40 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 41 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 42 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 47 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 52 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 65 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 66 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 67 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.02007 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00803 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00401 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00201 |
Grade A, and why
implement scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
C --> C1["curl -X POST localhost:8000/api/restart<br/>(no build step: Node's native strip-only TS loader runs TS directly)"] How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implement
Two halves: how to write the change (discipline) and how to land it in the running system (rebuild + restart).
The skill exists because both halves are easy to get wrong:
- Agents over-engineer simple changes when they're not anchored.
- Agents rebuild the wrong component (or worse, all components when they didn't need to) after editing files.
Quick decision tree
flowchart TD
A["Did you edit code?"] --> B["src/extension/"]
A --> C["src/server/ or src/shared/"]
A --> D["src/client/ (dev mode)"]
A --> E["src/client/ (prod mode)"]
A --> F["Multi-component / openspec"]
B --> B1["npm run reload"]
C --> C1["curl -X POST localhost:8000/api/restart<br/>(no build step: Node's native strip-only TS loader runs TS directly)"]
D --> D1["nothing, Vite HMR"]
E --> E1["npm run build && restart"]
F --> F1["npx tsx .pi/skills/implement/scripts/full-rebuild.ts"]
Quick check current mode:
npx tsx .pi/skills/implement/scripts/check-mode.ts # prints "dev" or "production"
Restart server (preserves mode unless overridden):
npx tsx .pi/skills/implement/scripts/restart-server.ts # graceful restart, keeps mode
npx tsx .pi/skills/implement/scripts/restart-server.ts --dev # force dev mode
npx tsx .pi/skills/implement/scripts/restart-server.ts --prod # force production mode
Full rebuild (after openspec-apply or multi-component change):
npx tsx .pi/skills/implement/scripts/full-rebuild.ts
full-rebuild.tsdeploys the checked-out dev version to the local running instance (build + restart + reload). It is NOT a feature-implementation step — worktree / Docker-isolated feature work does not run it. The code-review gate is separate (below).Scripts are TypeScript (cross-platform). All invocations use
npx tsxso they work identically on Linux, macOS, and Windows.tsxis already a project dep.
Full matrix with edge cases (dev-mode fallback, fault-tolerant restart, single-restart-path rule) lives in references/rebuild-matrix.md.
What ships with it
15 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/code-discipline.md 6.5 KB
- references/code-discipline.md.AGENTS.md 490 B
- references/rebuild-matrix.md 5.1 KB
- references/rebuild-matrix.md.AGENTS.md 523 B
- scripts/check-mode.ts 1.0 KB runs code
- scripts/check-mode.ts.AGENTS.md 293 B
- scripts/full-rebuild.ts 3.6 KB runs code
- scripts/full-rebuild.ts.AGENTS.md 625 B
- scripts/parse-findings.ts 973 B runs code
- scripts/parse-findings.ts.AGENTS.md 400 B
- scripts/restart-server.ts 2.2 KB runs code
- scripts/restart-server.ts.AGENTS.md 341 B
- scripts/review-changes.ts 2.9 KB runs code
- scripts/review-changes.ts.AGENTS.md 508 B
- SKILL.md.AGENTS.md 534 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -3 lines 1524f02dffba
- 1mo ago First seen · 129 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A eb037d7405cd
implement is a skill published in the GitHub repository BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard (325 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 2,007 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
goga-cookbook
Principles for applying DSL specification in cell and CODEMANIFEST design.
goga-plan-by-design
Compile a design document into a ralphex execution plan.
goga-define-challenge
Challenge the complete product definition before the PRD is generated.
goga-define-project
Understand the current project before defining a product change that must fit into an existing product.
goga-define-requirements
Define the product requirements that describe what the product must do to deliver the established user experience and achieve the agreed product goals.
goga-define-resolve
Resolve product-level conflicts discovered during the definition process.