Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard --skill performance-optimizationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackbelttechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/performance-optimization)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackbelttechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/performance-optimization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blackbelttechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/performance-optimization/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackbelttechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/performance-optimization"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blackbelttechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/performance-optimization.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 309 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 312 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.02854 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.01142 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00571 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00285 |
Grade A, and why
performance-optimization scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- performance-optimization — 92% identical, 2 lines differ
- performance-optimization — 92% identical, 2 lines differ
- performance-optimization — 92% identical, 2 lines differ
- performance-optimization — 92% identical, 2 lines differ
- performance-optimization — 92% identical, 2 lines differ
- performance-optimization — 92% identical, 3 lines differ
- performance-optimization — 92% identical, 2 lines differ
- performance-optimization — 92% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 351 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Performance Optimization
Overview
Measure before optimizing. Performance work without measurement is guessing — and guessing leads to premature optimization that adds complexity without improving what matters. Profile first, identify the actual bottleneck, fix it, measure again. Optimize only what measurements prove matters.
When to Use
- Performance requirements exist in the spec (load time budgets, response time SLAs)
- Users or monitoring report slow behavior
- Core Web Vitals scores are below thresholds
- You suspect a change introduced a regression
- Building features that handle large datasets or high traffic
When NOT to use: Don't optimize before you have evidence of a problem. Premature optimization adds complexity that costs more than the performance it gains.
Core Web Vitals Targets
| Metric | Good | Needs Improvement | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|
| LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) | ≤ 2.5s | ≤ 4.0s | > 4.0s |
| INP (Interaction to Next Paint) | ≤ 200ms | ≤ 500ms | > 500ms |
| CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) | ≤ 0.1 | ≤ 0.25 | > 0.25 |
The Optimization Workflow
1. MEASURE → Establish baseline with real data
2. IDENTIFY → Find the actual bottleneck (not assumed)
3. FIX → Address the specific bottleneck
4. VERIFY → Measure again, confirm improvement
5. GUARD → Add monitoring or tests to prevent regression
Step 1: Measure
Two complementary approaches — use both:
- Synthetic (Lighthouse, DevTools Performance tab): Controlled conditions, reproducible. Best for CI regression detection and isolating specific issues.
- RUM (web-vitals library, CrUX): Real user data in real conditions. Required to validate that a fix actually improved user experience.
Frontend:
# Synthetic: Lighthouse in Chrome DevTools (or CI)
# Chrome DevTools → Performance tab → Record
# Chrome DevTools MCP → Performance trace
# RUM: Web Vitals library in code
import { onLCP, onINP, onCLS } from 'web-vitals';
onLCP(console.log);
onINP(console.log);
onCLS(console.log);
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 351 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 704ae50f19cf
performance-optimization is a skill published in the GitHub repository BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard (321 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 2,854 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
goga-prototype-plan-verification
Verification of the assembled architecture plan against the DSL.
goga-change-investigator
Evidence-driven root cause investigation.
goga-change-tracer
Semantic behavior reconstruction via tracing.
rn-debugging
This skill should be used when the user asks to "debug the app", "fix a crash", "diagnose a blank screen", "read error logs", "troubleshoot CDP connection", "check Metro status", "find native crashes", "inspect network failures", "the app crashed", "I see a blank screen", "the screen is white", "something broke", "app…
doctor
Explicit Codex workflow: Run strictly read-only Codex plugin, MCP contract, schema, and environment diagnostics; recommend but never execute recovery.
debug-screen
Explicit Codex workflow: Diagnose why the current screen is broken, showing unexpected content, or crashing. Gathers parallel evidence from all layers and applies a targeted fix.