Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add blackwell-systems/agent-lsp --skill lsp-impactgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/blackwell-systems/agent-lspWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-impact)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-impact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-impact/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-impact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp/lsp-impact.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.01844 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00922 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00369 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00184 |
Grade A, and why
lsp-impact scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Requires the agent-lsp MCP server.
lsp-impact
Blast-radius analysis for any symbol or file. Discovers all direct references, callers (via call hierarchy), and type relationships before you touch anything. Read-only — does not modify any files.
Run this skill before lsp-edit-export: impact tells you what exists and how widespread the change is; lsp-edit-export tells you how to execute the change safely.
Invocation:
- File path (e.g.
"internal/lsp/client.go") → use the File-level entry (Step 0) to surface all exported-symbol impact at once. - Symbol name in dot notation (e.g.
"codec.Encode","Buffer.Reset") → skip Step 0; start at Prerequisites, then Step 1.
Step 0 — File-level entry (when user provides a file path)
Use this shortcut when the user is changing or auditing an entire file rather
than a single symbol. blast_radius enumerates all exported symbols in
the file, resolves their references, and returns test callers (with enclosing
test function names) and non-test callers in a single call.
mcp__lsp__blast_radius({
"changed_files": ["/abs/path/to/file.go"],
"include_transitive": false // set true to surface second-order callers
})
Returns:
affected_symbols— each exported symbol with its reference counttest_callers— test files + enclosing test function namesnon_test_callers— production call sites
Decision after Step 0:
| Result | Action |
|---|---|
| 0 non-test callers | Low blast radius. Proceed with change. |
| Few callers, known files | Medium risk. Update each call site. |
| Many callers across packages | High risk. Consider staged rollout. |
| Want symbol-level detail | Continue to Steps 1–5 for any specific symbol. |
Skip Steps 1–5 if the file-level summary is sufficient.
Prerequisites (for symbol-level Steps 1–5)
If LSP is not yet initialized, call mcp__lsp__start_lsp with the workspace
root first.
Check what the server supports before proceeding — find_callers and
type_hierarchy are optional LSP features not implemented by all servers:
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 221 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 1a0fd650783e
lsp-impact is a skill published in the GitHub repository blackwell-systems/agent-lsp (123 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,844 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
authoring-smell-rules
Add a findsmells rule to mache — a SQL query over the projected code graph that surfaces a code smell (duplication, complexity, dead code, drift). Use when adding or debugging a SmellRule in cmd/smellrules.go or an external $MACHESMELLRULESDIR rule. Covers the SmellRule struct, the standalone-vs-ast table capability…
m1nd-first
Use when investigating a repository, searching for implementation, reviewing changes, working from specs/docs, or preparing a risky code change in an environment where m1nd is available. This doctrine makes m1nd the first investigative layer before grep, glob, or manual file reads, except when the task is pure…
Sverklo Code Intelligence
Gives you deep codebase understanding — semantic search, blast-radius analysis, PR review, and health audits.
cartograph
Explore a codebase through Cartograph v2's PostgreSQL code graph: intent-aware context, exact/BM25/hybrid search, callers/callees/impact, affected tests, live source, review, freshness, and bounded index administration.
qartez
Semantic code intelligence skill for qartez MCP. Use qartez tools for code exploration, impact analysis, and guarded refactors; treat built-in code-tool denials as routing signals and recover via qartez replacements.
printing-press-output-review
Internal sub-skill: agentic review of a printed CLI's sampled command output for plausibility issues that rule-based checks can't encode (substring-match relevance, format bugs, silent source drops, ranking failures). Invoked via the Skill tool by the main printing-press skill at Phase 4.85 and printing-press-polish…