Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills --skill git-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/git-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/git-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/git-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Privilege Escalation · line 369 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high Tool Misuse · line 94 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- high Tool Misuse · line 136 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- high Privilege Escalation · line 372 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.02036 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01018 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00407 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
git-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 423 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Workflow
Essential Git patterns for effective version control. Eliminates ~120-150 lines of redundant Git guidance per agent.
Commit Best Practices
Conventional Commits Format
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<body>
<footer>
Types:
feat: New featurefix: Bug fixdocs: Documentation onlyrefactor: Code change that neither fixes bug nor adds featureperf: Performance improvementtest: Adding or updating testschore: Build process, dependencies, tooling
Examples:
feat(auth): add OAuth2 authentication
Implements OAuth2 flow using Google provider.
Includes token refresh and validation.
Closes #123
fix(api): handle null response in user endpoint
Previously crashed when user not found.
Now returns 404 with error message.
perf(db): optimize user query with index
Reduces query time from 500ms to 50ms.
Atomic Commits
# Good: Each commit does one thing
git commit -m "feat: add user authentication"
git commit -m "test: add auth tests"
git commit -m "docs: update API docs for auth"
# Bad: Multiple unrelated changes
git commit -m "add auth, fix bugs, update docs"
Branching Strategy
Git Flow (Feature Branches)
# Create feature branch from main
git checkout main
git pull origin main
git checkout -b feature/user-authentication
# Work on feature with regular commits
git add src/auth.py
git commit -m "feat(auth): implement login endpoint"
# Keep branch updated with main
git checkout main
git pull origin main
git checkout feature/user-authentication
git rebase main # Or: git merge main
# Push and create PR
git push -u origin feature/user-authentication
Trunk-Based Development
# Work directly on main with short-lived branches
git checkout main
git pull origin main
git checkout -b fix/null-pointer
# Make small change
git commit -m "fix: handle null in user query"
git push origin fix/null-pointer
# Merge immediately via PR
Common Workflows
Updating Branch with Latest Changes
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 423 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A ac51c3f59c9c
git-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills (74 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 2,036 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
git-workflow
Essential Git patterns for effective version control, eliminating redundant Git guidance per agent.
git-expert
Expert-level Git version control with advanced workflows, branching strategies, and best practices for team collaboration. Use when the user mentions version control, collaboration, or workflow, or when the task involves Essential Git Commands, Advanced Git Techniques, Branching Strategies, or Conflict Resolution.
git-commit-helper
Writes clear, conventional-commit-style commit messages from staged git diffs, and can split unrelated changes into separate commits.
git-workflow-management
Git workflow automation skill for commit message generation, branch management, pre-commit checks, and change history analysis.
development-workflow
Detailed development workflow with modular patterns for git, review, testing, and deployment.
ship-it
A GitHub workflow for finishing an implemented issue: commit the relevant changes, push a branch, create a pull request, merge it, and close the issue. GitHub is a service for hosting code and reviewing changes, and a pull request is a proposed change for review.