Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/bonifatius94/myscrape/stability-experimentnpx skills add Bonifatius94/myscrape --skill stability-experimentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Bonifatius94/myscrapeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bonifatius94/myscrape/stability-experiment)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bonifatius94/myscrape/stability-experiment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bonifatius94/myscrape/stability-experiment.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.00482 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00241 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
stability-experiment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Running a stability experiment
This is the method that established the operating point (specs/EXPERIMENTS.md).
Reuse it; don't improvise.
Tool
go run ./cmd/bench— runs the query set through the full httpx stack (cache- per-host rate limit + retry) and reports
ratelimit_rate. The gate passes only when it's0. For isolating an endpoint, a few rawhttp.Gets at a fixed spacing are enough — the point is controlled, attributable observation.
- per-host rate limit + retry) and reports
The method (in order)
- Check the persistence confound FIRST. Measure how long a rate-limit lasts before any comparative test. If it persists for hours, back-to-back runs aren't attributable to code — a "fix" may just be a lapsed limit. Probe isolated requests over time right after a limited run; proceed only if recovery is short (minutes — which is what the reference found for DDG).
- Isolate one variable (spacing, UA, endpoint, headers) — change exactly one.
- Prefer slowing down over evasion. Stability over throughput is the rule. Longer intervals / more jitter before anything clever; never proxies/CAPTCHA (out of scope — the honest fallback is a keyed API).
- Validate on the full stack (
cmd/bench), not just an isolated probe. - Keep the gate aligned with the strategy — if you pace deliberately, the gate must expect the pace, not flag it.
- Bake the proven operating point into config defaults.
Documenting (required)
Summarize the finding in specs/EXPERIMENTS.md (Hypothesis · Setup · Observations ·
Results · Insight) and log the resulting decision via log-decision. Stop when the
gate passes with margin — not when it's theoretically optimal.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 36 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 2b5f2f92c76f
stability-experiment is a skill published in the GitHub repository Bonifatius94/myscrape (1 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 482 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
trace
Evidence-driven tracing lane that orchestrates competing tracer hypotheses in Claude built-in team mode.
smiles-validation
Strict SMILES validation, structural comparison, and modification verification. Catches invalid LLM-generated molecules.
mflux-debugging
Debug MLX ports by comparing against a PyTorch/diffusers reference via exported tensors/images (export-then-compare).
social-physics-filter
Unified boundary enforcement, interpersonal diagnostic, and relational audit engine. Absorbs 40 psychology + 2 social protocols and all relationship case studies.
cnsplots
Create, revise, and troubleshoot publication-ready scientific plots in Python with cnsplots, including distribution, regression, heatmap, genomics, survival, set, flow, and multi-panel figures. Use when a user asks for cnsplots code, Cell/Nature/Science-style visualization, precise pixel-sized figures, statistical…
thinking-scientific-method
When a symptom has several plausible causes, rank falsifiable hypotheses and run the cheapest discriminating observation first; prefer least-assumptive survivors only after evidence fit.