Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add borghei/AI-Skills-German-Law --skill gpai-pflichtengit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/AI-Skills-German-LawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/borghei/ai-skills-german-law/gpai-pflichten)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/borghei/ai-skills-german-law/gpai-pflichten"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/borghei/ai-skills-german-law/gpai-pflichten/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/borghei/ai-skills-german-law/gpai-pflichten"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/borghei/ai-skills-german-law/gpai-pflichten.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00107 | $0.02978 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00043 | $0.01191 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00596 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00298 |
Grade A, and why
gpai-pflichten scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 19d ago First seen · 129 lines · 107 tokens per session scan A 2a540d12012e
gpai-pflichten is a skill published in the GitHub repository borghei/AI-Skills-German-Law (37 stars, last pushed 10d ago), with no licence file. It adds 107 tokens to every session and 2,978 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-28.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-privacy-assessment
Guides the combined DPIA and AI Act conformity assessment for AI systems processing personal data. Covers EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 5/2021, training data lawfulness under Art. 6 and Art. 9, Art. 22 automated decision-making, algorithmic bias detection, and NIST AI RMF MAP function. Keywords: AI privacy, DPIA, AI Act…
ai-inventory-bossmann007
Inventário de sistemas de IA por sistema (framework brasileiro) — rastreia o papel de cada sistema (fornecedor/desenvolvedor, operador/implementador, distribuidor) e o nível de risco (risco excessivo/proibido, alto risco, risco geral) sob o PL 2338/2023 e a sobreposição da LGPD (Art. 20 — decisão automatizada). Papel…
arckit-au-ai-assurance-tractorjuice
You are an enterprise architect generating an AI assurance assessment for an Australian Government or regulated-sector AI / machine-learning system.
triage-government-ai-use-case-l0cka
Route an Australian government AI use case to the applicable assurance track — the mandatory DTA policy artefacts for Commonwealth entities or the state and territory frameworks for NSW, Victoria, Queensland, WA, SA, Tasmania, the ACT and the NT — with each jurisdiction's escalation threshold, using a verified…
assess-automated-decision-transparency-l0cka
Assess current and commencing Australian privacy transparency obligations for automated and AI-assisted decisions, including Privacy Act APP 1.7–1.9 commencing 10 December 2026 and Western Australia PRIS IPP 10 from 1 July 2026. Use for decision inventories, privacy-policy readiness, consequential AI decisions…
healthcare-ai-privacy
Addresses healthcare AI privacy at the intersection of HIPAA and the EU AI Act for clinical decision support systems. Covers training data PHI handling, model transparency and explainability, patient rights in algorithmic decisions, FDA/OCR regulatory coordination, and bias monitoring. Keywords: healthcare AI, HIPAA…