Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add borhen68/SkillEngine --skill ai-opsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borhen68/SkillEngineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/borhen68/skillengine/ai-ops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/borhen68/skillengine/ai-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/borhen68/skillengine/ai-ops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/borhen68/skillengine/ai-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/borhen68/skillengine/ai-ops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.02562 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.01025 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00512 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00256 |
Grade A, and why
ai-ops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 322 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI Ops
Overview
Deploying a machine learning model is the easy part. Keeping it correct, fast, fair, and cost-effective in production is where most AI projects fail. AI Ops (MLOps) bridges the gap between data science experimentation and production engineering — covering model deployment, monitoring, retraining, and governance.
The AI Ops contract: A model in production is software that happens to be probabilistic. It needs all the same operational rigor as any other service — plus additional checks for correctness drift, data distribution shifts, and fairness degradation.
When to Use
- Deploying a model to production for inference
- Setting up model monitoring and drift detection
- Designing retraining pipelines and strategies
- Building feature stores and serving infrastructure
- Implementing A/B testing for model variants
- Ensuring model governance, explainability, and compliance
- Optimizing inference latency and throughput
NOT for:
- Model training and experimentation (this is data science work)
- Building the initial model prototype
- Pure research without production intent
The AI Ops Process
Step 1: Define Model Success Criteria
Before deploying, define what "working" means:
MODEL SUCCESS CONTRACT:
├── Accuracy: [metric and threshold, e.g. AUC-ROC > 0.85]
├── Latency: [p50 < 50ms, p99 < 200ms]
├── Throughput: [min X requests/second]
├── Fairness: [demographic parity difference < 0.05]
├── Explainability: [SHAP/LIME available for all predictions]
├── Cost: [inference cost per request < $0.001]
└── Drift: [input distribution PSI < 0.2, concept drift < 5% accuracy drop]
Step 2: Design the Serving Architecture
SERVING PATTERN SELECTION:
Latency Requirement → Architecture
─────────────────────────────────────────────────
< 10ms (real-time) → In-process inference (embedded model)
10-100ms (near-real) → Dedicated inference service (containerized)
100ms-1s (interactive) → Auto-scaled inference cluster
> 1s (batch) → Async queue + worker pool (batch inference)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 322 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 2fa6d56957e0
ai-ops is a skill published in the GitHub repository borhen68/SkillEngine (17 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 2,562 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-and-quality
A code-review guide for checking changes across correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance before they are merged.
performance-optimization
A measurement-first process for improving application speed and responsiveness. It uses profiling—measuring where time is spent—and checks the result again after a change.
constraint-driven-development
A development method for writing a project's quality standards as a lasting, checkable contract. It can cover areas such as test coverage, security, performance, accessibility, and architecture.
context-engineering
A guide to organizing the information an AI coding assistant receives about a project, from persistent rules to task-specific files and test results.
doubt-driven-development
A development practice that puts an independent, fresh-context challenge in front of important coding decisions.
test-driven-development
Instructions for test-driven development, or TDD: writing a failing test first, then the smallest code that makes it pass, followed by cleanup.