Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add boringmarketer/kimi-first --skill boringoperator-wogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boringmarketer/kimi-firstWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/boringmarketer/kimi-first/boringoperator-wo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boringmarketer/kimi-first/boringoperator-wo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boringmarketer/kimi-first/boringoperator-wo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boringmarketer/kimi-first/boringoperator-wo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boringmarketer/kimi-first/boringoperator-wo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.01239 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00496 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00248 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
boringoperator-wo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
boringoperator WO authoring
Every codex WO for ~/Code/boringoperator follows this contract:
-
FIRST LINE of every prompt: "Read dev-docs/wo-context-pack.md at the repo root FIRST — it is binding context (mission, laws, dialect, loop, hygiene)." Never re-paste pack content into prompts; reference it. Add ONLY:
- the lane's goal in one paragraph
- verified defects/evidence (file:line, DB audit results) — never vibes
- lane-specific constraints (files owned by other unmerged waves, migration number claimed after checking main AND open branches, gates that stay off)
- the proof contract and output shape
-
Builder lanes: terra ultra, fresh worktree, npm ci first. Reviewer lanes: sol, high for product surfaces, xhigh when migrations/custody in scope; sol writes REVIEW-.md and is the only one who touches it.
-
Fix rounds: reference the review file by name, quote nothing that the review already states — "read Round N in full" + clear-condition list.
-
After every lane lands: Claude live-films, records the design verdict, then dispatches sol. Merge order: one train at a time; capability-map conflicts resolve by regeneration on the merged tree; hosted migrations apply BEFORE app deploys that read them.
-
SIMPLICITY COUNTERWEIGHT (James, Sep 1): codex tends to overengineer. Every builder WO carries the context pack's "Solution style" section as binding; when reviewing terra's output, treat unrequested abstraction, knobs, layers, or breadth as findings to strip, not bonuses. Ask of every diff: is there a smaller true change?
-
WO IS A FILE (Sep 1): every WO lives at dev-docs/wo-.md and is committed to main BEFORE dispatch; "ready to dispatch" in memory alone is not ready (the readback-truth WO had to be re-derived from scratch). Evidence rows the WO cites go to dev-docs/evidence/-.json.
-
EVIDENCE-FIRST DIAGNOSIS (Sep 1): before a root-cause lane, Claude pulls the hosted rows read-only (Management API
database/queryas postgres, wrapped inbegin; set transaction read only; …; commit;; token = keychain "Supabase CLI" go-keyring-base64 decoded) and states in the WO what is VERIFIED, what is NOT a defect, and what is NOT evidence. Two of three checkpointed hypotheses were wrong on the readback lane; a codex lane dispatched on them would have chased phantoms. When live provider reads are needed, D0 of the lane = a read-only diagnostic script Claude runs with creds — codex never sees creds. -
MERGE TRAIN READS THE WORKTREE, NOT MEMORY: migration list, conflict dry-run (
git merge-tree --write-tree --name-only main <branch>), and the recovery drill on the MERGED chain (main's newer migrations + the branch's have never been applied together). Design verdict gates the merge alongside sol's; the merge itself is mechanical → Sonnet seat, Fable reviews the merge diff and pushes. -
Zoom-out check before dispatching any lane: does this serve the mission (finished work, one gesture, Main Street)? Is it dollar-ranked? Is it class-1 (ceremony) or product-speed (no ceremony)? Would James call it overengineering?
-
LESSONS COMPOUND IN THE PACK (James, Sep 2): after every certification, distill any NEW blocker class into dev-docs/wo-context-pack.md "Standing lessons" (binding; builders report against it, reviewers attack it first). A lesson that lives only in Claude's memory never reaches a lane. Keep the list short; retire items that stop recurring.
-
READ RESULTS BEFORE STAMPING: assert
gh pr view --json state== MERGED before any "merged" record line or worktree removal; stamps fromdate -u; one proof run per worktree at a time; nevercodex exec resume --lastwith parallel lanes. -
LOOP V3 (James, Sep 3 — binding; see
ship-laneskill and repo dev-docs/loop-v3.md): classify the lane A/B/C first and never mix; ONE review pass with a checklist (sol once for A, design once on frames for B, none for C), ONE fix, merge; residue → the weekly punch batch; activation is supervised-first; ship through scripts/train.sh → verify--live.sh → scripts/activate-flag.sh; done = live on DD with a receipt. Every WO uses dev-docs/wo-template.md. The "after every lane lands: film → design → sol" sentence in item 4 is superseded by this item.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines 33142ef899e9
- 1mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A e08f51d145c7
boringoperator-wo is a skill published in the GitHub repository boringmarketer/kimi-first (49 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,239 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
paperclip
Use for Paperclip-managed tasks and heartbeats: reading task context, delivering task documents or files, updating completion or blockers, coordinating or delegating work, and following company governance. Includes control plane API operations for assignments, comments, approvals, and routines.
gh-file-issue
Use when filing a new Codewhale GitHub issue: turn a bug or idea into a well-formed, actionable issue with repro, acceptance criteria, labels, and milestone.
gh-treasure-hunt
Hunt the issue/PR queue for highest value-over-risk wins: clean focused community PRs, already-implemented issues to close, safe quick-fixes.
review-my-team
Review a connected Paperclip team's agents, tasks, blockers and pending approvals when the user asks for a team summary or what needs attention.
requirements-writer
Use when converting PM intake into a slice SPEC.md with observable acceptance outcomes, explicit scope, and advisory sibling build dependencies.
mission-control
Interact with Mission Control — AI agent orchestration dashboard. Use when registering agents, managing tasks, syncing skills, or querying agent/task status via MC APIs.