Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add boshi-xixixi/TraeSkill --skill agent-supply-chaingit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boshi-xixixi/TraeSkillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/agent-supply-chain)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/agent-supply-chain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/agent-supply-chain/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/agent-supply-chain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/boshi-xixixi/traeskill/agent-supply-chain.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00119 | $0.02524 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.01262 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00505 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00252 |
Grade A, and why
agent-supply-chain scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- agent-supply-chain — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- agent-supply-chain — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- agent-supply-chain — 89% identical, 10 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 340 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Supply Chain Integrity
Generate and verify integrity manifests for AI agent plugins and tools. Detect tampering, enforce version pinning, and establish supply chain provenance.
Overview
Agent plugins and MCP servers have the same supply chain risks as npm packages or container images — except the ecosystem has no equivalent of npm provenance, Sigstore, or SLSA. This skill fills that gap.
Plugin Directory → Hash All Files (SHA-256) → Generate INTEGRITY.json
↓
Later: Plugin Directory → Re-Hash Files → Compare Against INTEGRITY.json
↓
Match? VERIFIED : TAMPERED
When to Use
- Before promoting a plugin from development to production
- During code review of plugin PRs
- As a CI step to verify no files were modified after review
- When auditing third-party agent tools or MCP servers
- Building a plugin marketplace with integrity requirements
Pattern 1: Generate Integrity Manifest
Create a deterministic INTEGRITY.json with SHA-256 hashes of all plugin files.
import hashlib
import json
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from pathlib import Path
EXCLUDE_DIRS = {".git", "__pycache__", "node_modules", ".venv", ".pytest_cache"}
EXCLUDE_FILES = {".DS_Store", "Thumbs.db", "INTEGRITY.json"}
def hash_file(path: Path) -> str:
"""Compute SHA-256 hex digest of a file."""
h = hashlib.sha256()
with open(path, "rb") as f:
for chunk in iter(lambda: f.read(8192), b""):
h.update(chunk)
return h.hexdigest()
def generate_manifest(plugin_dir: str) -> dict:
"""Generate an integrity manifest for a plugin directory."""
root = Path(plugin_dir)
files = {}
for path in sorted(root.rglob("*")):
if not path.is_file():
continue
if path.name in EXCLUDE_FILES:
continue
if any(part in EXCLUDE_DIRS for part in path.relative_to(root).parts):
continue
rel = path.relative_to(root).as_posix()
files[rel] = hash_file(path)
# Chain hash: SHA-256 of all file hashes concatenated in sorted order
chain = hashlib.sha256()
for key in sorted(files.keys()):
chain.update(files[key].encode("ascii"))
manifest = {
"plugin_name": root.name,
"generated_at": datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
"algorithm": "sha256",
"file_count": len(files),
"files": files,
"manifest_hash": chain.hexdigest(),
}
return manifest
# Generate and save
manifest = generate_manifest("my-plugin/")
Path("my-plugin/INTEGRITY.json").write_text(
json.dumps(manifest, indent=2) + "\n"
)
print(f"Generated manifest: {manifest['file_count']} files, "
f"hash: {manifest['manifest_hash'][:16]}...")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 340 lines · 119 tokens per session scan A 5b678338dca4
agent-supply-chain is a skill published in the GitHub repository boshi-xixixi/TraeSkill (262 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 119 tokens to every session and 2,524 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
<skill-name>
A template for defining a coding-agent skill, including its title, trigger situations, overview, workflow, common mistakes, and optional references.
spec-writing
A method for writing a software specification: a document that records decisions, reasons, boundaries, and ways to judge whether implementation succeeded. It first checks whether important unknowns require user clarification or technical research.
onboarding-unknown-codebase
A method for quickly understanding an unfamiliar codebase, meaning a software project whose structure and behavior you do not yet know. It builds a project map by examining overview files, directories, and one main execution path.
commit-message
A guide for writing clear, traceable Git commit messages using the Conventional Commits format, which labels changes such as features, bug fixes, documentation, and refactoring.
clarifying-questions
Guidance for clarifying vague or assumption-heavy requests before making changes.
debugging
A systematic method for finding the underlying cause of a software bug by observing the failure, forming a hypothesis, and testing it.