Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add bovinphang/frontend-craft --skill fec-accessibility-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bovinphang/frontend-craftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bovinphang/frontend-craft/fec-accessibility-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bovinphang/frontend-craft/fec-accessibility-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bovinphang/frontend-craft/fec-accessibility-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bovinphang/frontend-craft/fec-accessibility-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bovinphang/frontend-craft/fec-accessibility-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.00683 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00342 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
fec-accessibility-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
无障碍实现规范（WCAG 2.2 AA）
用途
确保前端 UI 对残障用户可访问，满足 WCAG 2.2 AA 的核心要求，并能被键盘、屏幕阅读器、触控和缩放用户稳定使用。
流程
- 检查语义结构：landmark、标题层级、表单 label、按钮/链接可访问名称、表格语义和图片 alt。
- 检查键盘路径：Tab 顺序、Enter/Space/Esc 行为、焦点可见、关闭后焦点恢复。
- 检查复杂组件：对话框、菜单、标签页、树、抽屉、表格和自定义控件的 ARIA 状态。
- 检查动态状态：loading、empty、error、toast 和异步更新需要被屏幕阅读器感知。
- 检查视觉与触控可读性：文本/背景对比、focus ring、缩放到 200%、减少动效偏好、触摸目标尺寸和移动端虚拟键盘行为。
- 用真实键盘路径复核关键流程，必要时补充屏幕阅读器或浏览器无障碍树观察；屏幕阅读器流程见 references/screen-reader-testing.md。
- 复核 WCAG 2.2 新增高频风险：可见焦点不被遮挡、拖拽操作有替代路径、目标尺寸过小、帮助入口和认证流程不依赖记忆负担。
- 输出分级报告；报告格式见 references/report-template.md。
详细参考
撰写无障碍审查报告时，加载 references/report-template.md。需要验证屏幕阅读器公告、焦点读法和动态区域时，加载 references/screen-reader-testing.md。
约束
- 优先使用语义化 HTML，而不是 ARIA。
role不应覆盖原生语义。- 交互元素必须可键盘访问。
- 表单错误必须与字段关联。
- 颜色对比度风险需要指出具体文本/背景组合。
- 不用 ARIA 弥补可以用原生 HTML 解决的问题。
- 不把浏览器自动可访问树当作最终结论；关键路径需要用键盘和至少一种辅助技术或等价检查验证。
预期输出
交互元素可键盘访问，语义和 ARIA 使用正确，焦点管理稳定；无障碍检查报告保存为 reports/accessibility-review-YYYY-MM-DD-HHmmss.md。
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 40 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A c82e6855b6b2
fec-accessibility-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository bovinphang/frontend-craft (21 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 683 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
brand-design
Brand-aware design system generator that acts as Head of Brand. Translates abstract brand language into a mathematically-validated, implementation-ready design system, writes creative-brief.md as the source of truth for all UI/UX in a project, and optionally compiles it to framework tokens (Tailwind v4 @theme, v3…
aesthetic-instrument
A committed aesthetic in the sense of skills/committed-aesthetic/SKILL.md: every rule below is checkable, and every value was read out of the source — packages/board/public/index.html and greatcto-site/styles.css — rather than chosen to write this document.
committed-aesthetic
How to write — and how to use — a skill that IS one aesthetic rather than a catalogue of them. A catalogue lets an agent pick, and it picks the modal option; a committed aesthetic makes it execute one thing precisely, against rules you can check. Use when a design keeps coming out competent and forgettable, when…
review-all
Multi-agent code review for diffs (project-agnostic). Covers standards, bugs, security, DRY, smells, perf, tests, API contracts, a11y/i18n. Verifies each finding to eliminate false positives. Use for /review-all, pre-PR/pre-commit review, or auditing uncommitted/staged changes.
peekaboo
Provides runtime observation and interaction for native macOS interfaces through accessibility state and screenshots. Use when the task depends on visible or interactive state in a running SwiftUI/AppKit app: what is rendered, focused, selected, enabled, reachable through menus/windows/dialogs, or experienced across a…
elderly-ui-audit
A code review for making websites and mobile apps easier for older people to use, based on Chinese government accessibility guidelines.