Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/braxtonrose4/zorro-agent/codexnpx skills add braxtonROSE4/zorro-agent --skill codexgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/braxtonROSE4/zorro-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/braxtonrose4/zorro-agent/codex)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/braxtonrose4/zorro-agent/codex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/braxtonrose4/zorro-agent/codex.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00040 | $0.01105 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00553 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
codex scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to codex — 19 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codex CLI
Delegate coding tasks to Codex via the Zorro terminal. Codex is OpenAI's autonomous coding agent CLI.
Prerequisites
- Codex installed:
npm install -g @openai/codex - OpenAI API key configured
- Must run inside a git repository — Codex refuses to run outside one
- Use
pty=truein terminal calls — Codex is an interactive terminal app
One-Shot Tasks
terminal(command="codex exec 'Add dark mode toggle to settings'", workdir="~/project", pty=true)
For scratch work (Codex needs a git repo):
terminal(command="cd $(mktemp -d) && git init && codex exec 'Build a snake game in Python'", pty=true)
Background Mode (Long Tasks)
# Start in background with PTY
terminal(command="codex exec --full-auto 'Refactor the auth module'", workdir="~/project", background=true, pty=true)
# Returns session_id
# Monitor progress
process(action="poll", session_id="<id>")
process(action="log", session_id="<id>")
# Send input if Codex asks a question
process(action="submit", session_id="<id>", data="yes")
# Kill if needed
process(action="kill", session_id="<id>")
Key Flags
| Flag | Effect |
|---|---|
exec "prompt" |
One-shot execution, exits when done |
--full-auto |
Sandboxed but auto-approves file changes in workspace |
--yolo |
No sandbox, no approvals (fastest, most dangerous) |
PR Reviews
Clone to a temp directory for safe review:
terminal(command="REVIEW=$(mktemp -d) && git clone https://github.com/user/repo.git $REVIEW && cd $REVIEW && gh pr checkout 42 && codex review --base origin/main", pty=true)
Parallel Issue Fixing with Worktrees
# Create worktrees
terminal(command="git worktree add -b fix/issue-78 /tmp/issue-78 main", workdir="~/project")
terminal(command="git worktree add -b fix/issue-99 /tmp/issue-99 main", workdir="~/project")
# Launch Codex in each
terminal(command="codex --yolo exec 'Fix issue #78: <description>. Commit when done.'", workdir="/tmp/issue-78", background=true, pty=true)
terminal(command="codex --yolo exec 'Fix issue #99: <description>. Commit when done.'", workdir="/tmp/issue-99", background=true, pty=true)
# Monitor
process(action="list")
# After completion, push and create PRs
terminal(command="cd /tmp/issue-78 && git push -u origin fix/issue-78")
terminal(command="gh pr create --repo user/repo --head fix/issue-78 --title 'fix: ...' --body '...'")
# Cleanup
terminal(command="git worktree remove /tmp/issue-78", workdir="~/project")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 114 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 31002cb1c035
codex is a skill published in the GitHub repository braxtonROSE4/zorro-agent (8 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,105 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to codex, differing in 19 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
cost-optimize
Reduce the food cost of a menu to hit a target percentage through ingredient swaps, without sacrificing quality.
interview-kit
Draft a structured interview kit for shortlisted candidates — questions per competency, evidence sought, and what a strong answer looks like.
escalation-policy
Use when a ticket must be handed to a human agent instead of resolved by the AI.
dietary-check
Audit a menu for allergen labelling, vegan and halal coverage, and common dietary requirements.
plan-menu
Build a balanced, seasonal menu that meets a specified food-cost target and service period.
screen-cv
Screen a CV against a role brief, scoring evidence on each must-have and nice-to-have while ignoring bias signals.