AI Career Impact Advisor

AI Career Impact Advisor is a skill for Claude Code from BrennanJCollins/UnabatedPM-coaching. It costs 79 tokens per session (2,976 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A coaching and document-review skill for product managers adapting to how AI is changing their work. It explains why AI tools are becoming standard and assesses documents against a product-management rubric.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for interactive career guidance or to evaluate a product document on market understanding, problem discovery, and prioritisation.
Why use it?
It helps product managers make sense of workplace changes and find gaps in their thinking or written plans.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the unabatedpm-strategic-thinking plugin — 6 skills, 1 command shipped together

Good fit Use it for interactive career guidance or to evaluate a product document on market understanding, problem discovery, and prioritisation.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/brennanjcollins/unabatedpm-coaching/ai-career-impact-advisor
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add BrennanJCollins/UnabatedPM-coaching --skill ai-career-impact-advisor
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BrennanJCollins/UnabatedPM-coaching

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install unabatedpm-strategic-thinking, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills, 1 command.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for AI Career Impact Advisor

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brennanjcollins/unabatedpm-coaching/ai-career-impact-advisor/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/brennanjcollins/unabatedpm-coaching/ai-career-impact-advisor)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brennanjcollins/unabatedpm-coaching/ai-career-impact-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brennanjcollins/unabatedpm-coaching/ai-career-impact-advisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for AI Career Impact Advisor

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brennanjcollins/unabatedpm-coaching/ai-career-impact-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brennanjcollins/unabatedpm-coaching/ai-career-impact-advisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 79 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,976 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00079 $0.02976
Opus 5 $0.00039 $0.01488
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00595
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00298

Measured 12d ago against content hash f0ce3bd3f443, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

AI Career Impact Advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

unabatedpm-strategic-thinking/skills/ai-career-impact-advisor/SKILL.md · 234 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 234 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Operating Modes

This skill operates in two modes:

Conversation mode (default): Coach the PM through the framework interactively. Triggered by direct invocation or natural conversation.

Evaluate mode: Read a document silently, score it against this skill's rubric, and return structured findings. No conversation, no questions — just assessment. Triggered by the /audit orchestrator.

Evaluate Mode Instructions

When invoked in evaluate mode, you receive a document and return a structured assessment. Do NOT coach. Do NOT ask questions. Read and score.

Score each dimension 1-5:

  • 1 = Not present or fundamentally broken
  • 2 = Attempted but significant gaps
  • 3 = Competent but missing key elements
  • 4 = Strong with minor improvements possible
  • 5 = Exemplary — would pass senior PM review

Dimensions to evaluate:

  1. Market & customer intelligence — Does the PM understand how AI impacts their market/product? Do they distinguish AI-as-table-stakes from AI-as-differentiator? Or are they treating AI as either the solution to everything or irrelevant?

  2. Problem discovery & prioritization — Does the PM show evidence of asking better questions (human ingenuity) vs. generating faster answers (feature parity)? Do they understand what becomes commoditized vs. what appreciates in value?

Apply Feature Parity Convergence + Human Ingenuity thesis to score:

  • Feature Parity Convergence: Recognizes that AI-generated output is commoditized (PRDs, analysis, competitive research all sound the same)
  • Human Ingenuity Shift: Identifies what still requires judgment (problem framing, novel insights, stakeholder navigation, ethical decisions)
  • AI Adoption as Table Stakes: Using AI is baseline, not differentiating
  • Ask Don't Tell Leadership: PM shifts from having answers to asking better questions

Return format:

SKILL: AI Career Impact Advisor
CATEGORIES SCORED:
- Market & customer intelligence: [X]/5
  Evidence: "[exact quote showing AI strategy understanding or misunderstanding]"
  Gap: [does PM confuse commodity output with differentiation?]
  Upgrade: [single highest-leverage change]
- Problem discovery & prioritization: [X]/5
  Evidence: "[quote showing human ingenuity focus or answer-generation focus]"
  Gap: [what's the PM still over-investing in that's commoditized?]
  Upgrade: [single highest-leverage change]

AI CAREER POSITIONING:
- Adoption level: [Awareness / Usage / Integration / Strategy / Innovation]
- Commoditized activities being over-weighted: [list activities]
- Appreciating skills being under-weighted: [list skills]

Read the full file on GitHub · 234 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 234 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A f0ce3bd3f443

Subscribe to this mod's changes

AI Career Impact Advisor is a skill published in the GitHub repository BrennanJCollins/UnabatedPM-coaching (4 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 2,976 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.