Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add BrennanJCollins/UnabatedPM-coaching --skill bridge-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BrennanJCollins/UnabatedPM-coachingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/brennanjcollins/unabatedpm-coaching/bridge-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brennanjcollins/unabatedpm-coaching/bridge-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brennanjcollins/unabatedpm-coaching/bridge-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brennanjcollins/unabatedpm-coaching/bridge-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brennanjcollins/unabatedpm-coaching/bridge-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.02625 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.01050 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00525 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00263 |
Grade A, and why
Bridge Builder Coach scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 213 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Operating Modes
This skill operates in two modes:
Conversation mode (default): Coach the PM through bridge-building interactively. Triggered by direct invocation or natural conversation.
Evaluate mode: Read a document silently, score its bridge rigor, and return structured findings. No conversation, no questions — just assessment. Triggered by the /audit orchestrator.
Evaluate Mode Instructions
When invoked in evaluate mode, you receive a pitch, business case, or strategy document. Do NOT coach. Do NOT ask questions. Read and score.
Score each dimension 1-5:
- 1 = Not present or fundamentally broken
- 2 = Attempted but significant gaps
- 3 = Competent but missing key elements
- 4 = Strong with minor improvements possible
- 5 = Exemplary — would pass CFO review
Dimensions to evaluate:
-
Business models & pitching internally — Does the document show all 5 bridge levels (User Job → User Success Metric → Department KPI → Company Objective → Economic Lever)? Are any levels missing? Can you trace a complete chain from feature to buyer economics? Is each level quantified? Or does it stop at user benefit level without reaching buyer economics?
-
Sales enablement — Can the pitch be compressed to 45 seconds? Would it survive skeptical buyer objections (e.g., "What if adoption is lower than expected?" or "How do we know this will actually improve department KPI?")? Are assumptions documented and challengeable? Or is it vague with undefended claims?
Red flags to check:
- Feature pitches that stop at Level 1 (just describe what to build)
- Disconnected leaps (jumping from user task to economic lever without middle levels)
- Missing quantification at any level (especially Level 5 economic impact)
- Vague promises ("save money," "improve efficiency" without numbers)
- Missing user success metrics (no way to measure if Level 1 improvement happened)
- Department KPI disconnected from user success metric (assumed connection)
- Economic lever unlinked to company objective (e.g., cost savings claimed without showing department KPI impact)
- No objection handling for assumption risks
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 213 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A ccfb89a1ec96
Bridge Builder Coach is a skill published in the GitHub repository BrennanJCollins/UnabatedPM-coaching (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 2,625 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ma-playbook
M&A strategy for acquiring companies or being acquired. Due diligence, valuation, integration, and deal structure. Use when evaluating acquisitions, preparing for acquisition, M&A due diligence, integration planning, or deal negotiation.
financial-statement-analysis
Reads a set of financial statements and establishes what changed and why — fluctuation analysis against prior period and against budget, profitability, liquidity, solvency and efficiency ratios, benchmarking, and the non-GAAP measures presented alongside them. Use this to interpret results, review a counterparty's or…
agent-era-pricing
Redesign seat-based pricing for the agent era — when one human runs ten agents, per-seat models collapse. Use when agents are eroding seat counts, when asked to migrate to usage- or outcome-based pricing, to price an agent/API tier, or to defend revenue as customers automate their own usage. Produces a pricing…
collections-email
Write a polite-but-firm payment-reminder / collections email sequence for overdue invoices. Use when asked to write a collections email, a payment reminder, a dunning sequence, or to chase an overdue invoice. Produces a staged sequence — gentle pre-due nudge through escalating overdue reminders to a final notice …
cash-flow-forecaster
Forecast project cash flow based on schedule and cost data. Generate S-curves and payment projections.
historical-cost-analyzer
Analyze historical construction costs for benchmarking, trend analysis, and estimating calibration. Compare projects, track escalation, identify patterns.