Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to brianmontanaweb/agentic-design-system. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/brianmontanaweb/agentic-design-system/main/.claude/skills/verify-component/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brianmontanaweb/agentic-design-systemWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/brianmontanaweb/agentic-design-system/verify-component)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brianmontanaweb/agentic-design-system/verify-component"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brianmontanaweb/agentic-design-system/verify-component/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brianmontanaweb/agentic-design-system/verify-component"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brianmontanaweb/agentic-design-system/verify-component.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.00784 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00314 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00157 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
verify-component scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify Component
Build, lint, and test one component given $ARGUMENTS in the format <ComponentName>.
Gotchas
- Run
npm run buildbefore any lint —tsc --noEmitrequires the tokens package to be built first. - Scope is this component's files only — pre-existing violations elsewhere in the repo are not your responsibility and must not block a passing report.
- Fix, don't suppress — no
eslint-disablecomments; fix the underlying issue in the component's files. - Only verify files that exist — skip the story or test command (and say so) if that file hasn't been created yet; do not create missing files. Point to
/add-component-story//add-component-testsfor gaps.
Step 1 — Resolve files
ls packages/core/src/<ComponentName>/<ComponentName>.tsx packages/agents/src/<ComponentName>/<ComponentName>.tsx 2>/dev/null
If no output, stop immediately and respond:
## No source: <ComponentName>
Neither package contains `<ComponentName>`. Create it first with
`/add-component-source <ComponentName>` (source only) or `/add-component <ComponentName>` (full scaffold).
Infer the package from which path exists, then check which of these also exist:
packages/<package>/src/<ComponentName>/<ComponentName>.test.tsxapps/storybook/src/stories/<ComponentName>.stories.tsx
Step 2 — Build, lint, test
Run in order, skipping commands whose target file doesn't exist:
npm run build
eslint packages/<package>/src/<ComponentName>/<ComponentName>.tsx apps/storybook/src/stories/<ComponentName>.stories.tsx
npx vitest run packages/<package>/src/<ComponentName>/<ComponentName>.test.tsx
Fix any errors ESLint or vitest reports on this component's files, then re-run the failed command until it passes. If the build itself fails because of this component's files, fix and re-run; if it fails elsewhere in the repo, report it and stop — that is outside this skill's scope.
Also run the theme-safety check — components must support light/dark via semantic tokens only (see the Theming section of the shared conventions reference):
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 77 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 4626354ce5da
verify-component is a skill published in the GitHub repository brianmontanaweb/agentic-design-system (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 784 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
critique
Adversarial design critique of the current work. Render it, look at it, and argue for rejection. Run after the gates are green, never instead of them.
design-qa
Set up or run design QA gates for token + hardcoded-value lint, automated a11y (axe), contrast, visual regression across variants/states/themes/RTL, and the manual a11y checklist. Use when the user wants CI quality gates, to prevent design regressions, or to QA a component/screen before shipping.
gate
Run the one-command quality gate and report the real N/N result. Use before claiming any build/review is done.
ship
Pre-release gate. Run the full gate, responsive + render checks, then produce the release checklist (README badge/current/changelog). Use before tagging a release.
kb-python-development
Reference data, not a reviewer. Python and wxPython development: packaging (PyInstaller/Nuitka), testing, desktop accessibility APIs, cross-platform paths, and framework patterns.
deepeval
Use when discussing or working with DeepEval (the python AI evaluation framework).