Awesome Journal Skills is a collection of agent skill packs tailored to hundreds of academic journals across fields including economics, social science, medicine, science, and engineering. Researchers use the packs for tasks such as choosing topics, designing empirical strategies, preparing tables and figures, submitting papers, and responding to reviewers. The catalogue entries are the project's journal-specific skills and related plugins.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ccs-submissiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/ccs-submission)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/ccs-submission"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/ccs-submission/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/ccs-submission"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills/ccs-submission.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.00878 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00439 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00176 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
ccs-submission scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CCS Submission
Use this for a CCS paper submission audit. Reopen the current Call for Papers, the cycle's HotCRP site, the ACM sigconf template, and the ethics policy before giving deadline-ready advice, because CCS rules and dates are set per cycle.
Submission audit
- Confirm the target is the main CCS research track, not a workshop, poster, or the SIGSAC co-located events.
- Register the abstract in HotCRP before the registration deadline. CCS requires a mandatory title, author list, abstract, and topics one week before the full-paper deadline; no abstract, no paper. In 2026 registration led the paper deadline by seven days each cycle.
- Apply the unaltered ACM
sigconftwo-column template. CCS 2026 set a 12-page main-text limit excluding the bibliography, well-marked appendices, and supplementary material. Whitespace and margin tampering is forbidden and is a desk-reject trigger. - Enforce anonymization: cite your own prior work in the third person, blind references only where third-person phrasing is infeasible, and strip identity from text, PDF metadata, system names, and repository links.
- Place the ethics considerations content in a dedicated section (in 2026, an appendix after the 12-page body and bibliography) whenever the work touches human subjects, user data, or real-world vulnerabilities.
- Respect the per-cycle submission cap (2026: at most 7 papers per author per cycle) and the one-cycle rule — a first-cycle reject cannot return the same year.
- Confirm the work is not concurrently under review at another archival venue.
Blocking risks
- Missing abstract registration, or a late abstract or paper upload.
- Overlength main text or an altered
sigconftemplate. - Identity leak in the PDF, metadata, artifact link, or a non-blinded system name.
- Missing ethics considerations section for work that plainly needs one.
- Dual submission to another archival security venue.
- A threat model too vague for reviewers to score the attacker.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 75 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 261a9a6d62aa
ccs-submission is a skill published in the GitHub repository brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills (1,097 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 878 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
alterlab-open-notebook
Run Open Notebook, a self-hosted open-source alternative to Google NotebookLM with a full REST API, for AI-powered research and document analysis. Use when organizing research materials into notebooks, ingesting diverse content sources (PDFs, videos, audio, web pages, Office documents), generating AI-powered notes and…
alterlab-treatment-plans
Generates concise (3-4 page), focused medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF format across all clinical specialties — general medical treatment, rehabilitation therapy, mental health care, chronic disease management, perioperative care, and pain management — using SMART goal frameworks, evidence-based interventions with…
alterlab-pdf-explore
Explore a single PDF in depth — parse it once, then answer questions across its sections, figures, tables, and appendices — comparing methods across sections, extracting every instance of a pattern within the document, and reading values off its charts and tables. Use when interrogating one paper or report end-to-end…
alterlab-markitdown
Convert files and Office documents to clean, LLM-friendly Markdown with Microsoft MarkItDown (markitdown CLI/Python), supporting PDF, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, images (EXIF + OCR), audio (transcription), HTML, CSV, JSON, XML, ZIP archives, EPUB e-books, and YouTube transcript URLs, with optional AI image descriptions. Use…
thesis-consistency-audit
A consistency audit for quantitative master’s and doctoral theses in management, finance, or strategy. It checks whether numbers, tables, analyses, and claims agree, and can inspect hidden author information in office documents.
bilingual-paper-reader
A reading tool for translating an English research-paper PDF into Chinese paragraph by paragraph, with color labels for claims, innovations, methods, limits, and quotable sentences. It uses a reusable offline HTML reader and stores highlights in the browser.