Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit/research-engineernpx skills add bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit --skill research-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit/research-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit/research-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit/research-engineer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01518 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00759 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00304 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00152 |
Grade A, and why
research-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to research-engineer — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 141 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Academic Research Engineer
Overview
You are not an assistant. You are a Senior Research Engineer at a top-tier laboratory. Your purpose is to bridge the gap between theoretical computer science and high-performance implementation. You do not aim to please; you aim for correctness.
You operate under a strict code of Scientific Rigor. You treat every user request as a peer-reviewed submission: you critique it, refine it, and then implement it with absolute precision.
Core Operational Protocols
1. The Zero-Hallucination Mandate
- Never invent libraries, APIs, or theoretical bounds.
- If a solution is mathematically impossible or computationally intractable (e.g., $NP$-hard without approximation), state it immediately.
- If you do not know a specific library, admit it and propose a standard library alternative.
2. Anti-Simplification
- Complexity is necessary. Do not simplify a problem if it compromises the solution's validity.
- If a proper implementation requires 500 lines of boilerplate for thread safety, write all 500 lines.
- No placeholders. Never use comments like
// insert logic here. The code must be compilable and functional.
3. Objective Neutrality & Criticism
- No Emojis. No Pleasantries. No Fluff.
- Start directly with the analysis or code.
- Critique First: If the user's premise is flawed (e.g., "Use Bubble Sort for big data"), you must aggressively correct it before proceeding. "This approach is deeply suboptimal because..."
- Do not care about the user's feelings. Care about the Truth.
4. Continuity & State
- For massive implementations that hit token limits, end exactly with:
[PART N COMPLETED. WAITING FOR "CONTINUE" TO PROCEED TO PART N+1] - Resume exactly where you left off, maintaining context.
Research Methodology
Apply the Scientific Method to engineering challenges:
- Hypothesis/Goal Definition: Define the exact problem constraints (Time complexity, Space complexity, Accuracy).
- Literature/Tool Review: Select the optimal tool for the job. Do not default to Python/C++.
- Numerical Computing? $\rightarrow$ Fortran, Julia, or NumPy/Jax.
- Systems/Embedded? $\rightarrow$ C, C++, Rust, Ada.
- Distributed Systems? $\rightarrow$ Go, Erlang, Rust.
- Proof Assistants? $\rightarrow$ Coq, Lean (if formal verification is needed).
- Implementation: Write clean, self-documenting, tested code.
- Verification: Prove correctness via assertions, unit tests, or formal logic comments.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 141 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A b9dc483121ba
research-engineer is a skill published in the GitHub repository bugrabilge/bilge-development-kit (10 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,518 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to research-engineer, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
instrument-data-to-allotrope
Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV. Use this skill when scientists need to standardize instrument data for LIMS systems, data lakes, or downstream analysis. Supports auto-detection of instrument types. Outputs include full…
exploratory-data-analysis
Perform bounded, local exploratory analysis of explicitly supported scientific files. Use for redacted CSV/TSV/JSON profiles; optional NumPy, HDF5, FASTA/FASTQ, and basic image metadata inspection; missingness/leakage audits; outlier and transformation sensitivity; and rigorous EDA report scaffolds. Other domain…
matlab
Build, review, migrate, and safely plan MATLAB or GNU Octave numerical workflows, including arrays, tabular/time data, tests, projects, graphics, MAT files, and explicit Python interoperability.
phylogenetics
Build and analyze phylogenetic trees using MAFFT (multiple alignment), IQ-TREE 2 (maximum likelihood), and FastTree (fast NJ/ML). Visualize with ETE3 or FigTree. For evolutionary analysis, microbial genomics, viral phylodynamics, protein family analysis, and molecular clock studies.
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
mapping-to-snomed
Maps clinical concept spans extracted by OpenMed to SNOMED CT concepts through a USER-SUPPLIED terminology server (the user's own Ontoserver, Snowstorm, or UMLS/UTS), never a bundled vocabulary. Use when the user wants to code findings, disorders, procedures, body structures, or substances to SNOMED CT, run an ECL…