Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit --skill llm-evalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/llm-eval)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/llm-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/llm-eval/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/llm-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit/llm-eval.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01791 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00716 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00358 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
llm-eval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 212 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LLM Eval with deepeval
When to Use deepeval vs Spot-Checking
| Situation | Approach |
|---|---|
| New prompt variant before ship | deepeval regression suite |
| >20 test cases or automated CI | deepeval + Langfuse persistence |
| One-off "does this look right?" | Manual spot-check |
| SME rubric that must be locked and versioned | deepeval G-Eval + Langfuse dataset |
| RAG pipeline (Ask AI / Chakra AI) | Faithfulness + ContextualPrecision + Hallucination |
Rule of thumb: if you'd manually check the same thing twice, automate it.
Installation
pip install -U deepeval langfuse
deepeval login # optional: connects to Confident AI dashboard
Core Metrics — Use These First
from deepeval.metrics import (
GEval,
AnswerRelevancyMetric,
FaithfulnessMetric,
HallucinationMetric,
)
from deepeval.test_case import LLMTestCase, SingleTurnParams
# 1. G-Eval — custom rubric (SME-locked criteria go here)
sme_rubric = GEval(
name="CurriculumCorrectness",
criteria=(
"The answer must be factually accurate per NCERT Class 10 syllabus. "
"Penalise any out-of-syllabus content or incorrect formulae."
),
evaluation_params=[
SingleTurnParams.INPUT,
SingleTurnParams.ACTUAL_OUTPUT,
SingleTurnParams.EXPECTED_OUTPUT,
],
threshold=0.75,
)
# 2. Answer Relevancy — does the response address the question?
relevancy = AnswerRelevancyMetric(threshold=0.7)
# 3. Faithfulness — response grounded in retrieved context (RAG)
faithfulness = FaithfulnessMetric(threshold=0.8)
# 4. Hallucination — detects contradictions with context
hallucination = HallucinationMetric(threshold=0.2) # lower = stricter
Dataset Format
LLMTestCase(
input="What is the formula for kinetic energy?", # user query
actual_output=your_llm_response, # live LLM call
expected_output="KE = 0.5 * m * v^2", # golden answer
retrieval_context=["Kinetic energy is the energy ..."], # RAG chunks; omit if non-RAG
)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 212 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 52a1fb66d719
llm-eval is a skill published in the GitHub repository build-with-dhiraj/ai-workflow-framework-portability-kit (5 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,791 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-21.
Other skills, from other repositories
evaluating-llms-harness
Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.
cli-eval
Create and run evaluation suites, watch live benchmark progress, view scorecards, compare model performance, and integrate eval runs with CI workflows from the CLI.
data-quality-frameworks
Implement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts. Use when building data quality pipelines, implementing validation rules, or establishing data contracts.
model-merging
Merge multiple fine-tuned models using mergekit to combine capabilities without retraining. Use when creating specialized models by blending domain-specific expertise (math + coding + chat), improving performance beyond single models, or experimenting rapidly with model variants. Covers SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task…
dbt-transformation-patterns
Master dbt (data build tool) for analytics engineering with model organization, testing, documentation, and incremental strategies. Use when building data transformations, creating data models, or implementing analytics engineering best practices.
darwinian-evolver
Evolve prompts/regex/SQL/code with Imbue's evolution loop.