evaluating-llms-harness

evaluating-llms-harness is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from NousResearch/hermes-agent. It costs 29 tokens per session (3,561 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A toolkit for testing large language models (LLMs) against standard academic tasks. LLMs are systems that generate or understand text, and these benchmarks measure abilities such as reasoning, knowledge, coding, and truthfulness.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to evaluate Hugging Face models, models served by vLLM, and API-based models on benchmarks such as MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, and HellaSwag.
Why use it?
It gives model comparisons a shared set of tasks and metrics instead of relying on custom tests that may differ between projects. It can also help track changes during training.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: positional $N argument.

Good fit Use it to evaluate Hugging Face models, models served by vLLM, and API-based models on benchmarks such as MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, and HellaSwag.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/nousresearch/hermes-agent/evaluating-llms-harness
About the project

Hermes Agent is an AI assistant that learns from its use by creating and improving skills, retaining knowledge, searching past conversations, and adapting to its users. It is for people who want to run an agent through a terminal or messaging platforms while connecting it to different AI models and scheduled tasks.

NousResearch/hermes-agent · 256,529 stars · on GitHub · hermes-agent.nousresearch.com

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add NousResearch/hermes-agent --skill evaluating-llms-harness
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for evaluating-llms-harness

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nousresearch/hermes-agent/evaluating-llms-harness/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/nousresearch/hermes-agent/evaluating-llms-harness)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nousresearch/hermes-agent/evaluating-llms-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nousresearch/hermes-agent/evaluating-llms-harness/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for evaluating-llms-harness

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/nousresearch/hermes-agent/evaluating-llms-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/nousresearch/hermes-agent/evaluating-llms-harness.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 29 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,561 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • Snyk pass 7 Sept 2026
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high Output Handling · line 461
    Model output is used without validation or sanitization. Unvalidated output injected into downstream contexts (SQL, shell, HTML) enables injection attacks and arbitrary code execution.
    Fix: Validate and sanitize all model output before using it in downstream contexts. Use parameterized queries for SQL, shell quoting for commands, and HTML encoding for web output.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00029 $0.03561
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.01424
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00712
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00356

Measured 29d ago against content hash 9a021e8e64fd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

evaluating-llms-harness scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 29d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Runs shell commandslowCapability

Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.

os.system(f"./eval_checkpoint.sh checkpoints step-{step}")
Origin

Copies of this mod

8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

optional-skills/mlops/evaluation/evaluating-llms-harness/SKILL.md · 500 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 500 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

lm-evaluation-harness - LLM Benchmarking

What's inside

Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.

Quick start

lm-evaluation-harness evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks using standardized prompts and metrics.

Installation:

pip install lm-eval

Evaluate any HuggingFace model:

lm_eval --model hf \
  --model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
  --tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag \
  --device cuda:0 \
  --batch_size 8

View available tasks:

lm-eval ls tasks

Common workflows

Workflow 1: Standard benchmark evaluation

Evaluate model on core benchmarks (MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval).

Copy this checklist:

Benchmark Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Choose benchmark suite
- [ ] Step 2: Configure model
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluation
- [ ] Step 4: Analyze results

Step 1: Choose benchmark suite

Core reasoning benchmarks:

  • MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) - 57 subjects, multiple choice
  • GSM8K - Grade school math word problems
  • HellaSwag - Common sense reasoning
  • TruthfulQA - Truthfulness and factuality
  • ARC (AI2 Reasoning Challenge) - Science questions

Code benchmarks:

  • HumanEval - Python code generation (164 problems)
  • MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) - Python coding

Standard suite (recommended for model releases):

--tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag,truthfulqa,arc_challenge

Step 2: Configure model

HuggingFace model:

lm_eval --model hf \
  --model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,dtype=bfloat16 \
  --tasks mmlu \
  --device cuda:0 \
  --batch_size auto  # Auto-detect optimal batch size

Quantized model (4-bit/8-bit):

lm_eval --model hf \
  --model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,load_in_4bit=True \
  --tasks mmlu \
  --device cuda:0

Read the full file on GitHub · 500 lines

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 29d ago Changed 9a021e8e64fd
  2. 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines b1eca38908ef
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 499 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A d6f1d357a656

Subscribe to this mod's changes

evaluating-llms-harness is a skill published in the GitHub repository NousResearch/hermes-agent (256,529 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 3,561 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

llm-evaluator

Evaluate LLM outputs systematically using LLM-as-judge, human evaluation frameworks, and regression testing. Use when assessing model quality, comparing models, or preventing quality regression.

chandrudp29/skillhub · 39 tokens

rag-evaluator

Evaluate RAG pipeline quality across faithfulness, relevance, and hallucination metrics. Use when user asks to test, benchmark, or improve a RAG system, or when RAG outputs look wrong.

chandrudp29/skillhub · 44 tokens

ai-prompt-regression-testing

Prompt engineering regression test matrix register: baseline outputs, semantic drift thresholds, judge evaluations, and golden dataset.

lingxling/awesome-skills-cn · 28 tokens

evaluating-llms-harness

Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.

StarryCod/cogitum · 29 tokens

mle-workflow

Production machine-learning engineering workflow for data contracts, reproducible training, model evaluation, deployment, monitoring, and rollback. Use when building, reviewing, or hardening ML systems beyond one-off notebooks.

affaan-m/ECC · 44 tokens

kotlin-testing

Kotlin testing patterns with Kotest, MockK, coroutine testing, property-based testing, and Kover coverage. Follows TDD methodology with idiomatic Kotlin practices.

affaan-m/ECC · 38 tokens