evaluating-llms-harness

evaluating-llms-harness is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from StarryCod/cogitum. It costs 29 tokens per session (3,517 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of evaluating-llms-harness, MIT.

A test suite for measuring how well language models perform on more than 60 standard academic tasks. These include general knowledge, mathematics, coding, truthfulness, and common-sense reasoning tests.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to benchmark models, compare different models, report research results, or track changes during training.
Why use it?
It gives model comparisons a shared set of questions and measurements instead of relying on informal impressions.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: positional $N argument.

Good fit Use it to benchmark models, compare different models, report research results, or track changes during training.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/starrycod/cogitum/lm-evaluation-harness
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add StarryCod/cogitum --skill lm-evaluation-harness
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/StarryCod/cogitum

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for evaluating-llms-harness

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/starrycod/cogitum/lm-evaluation-harness/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/starrycod/cogitum/lm-evaluation-harness)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/starrycod/cogitum/lm-evaluation-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/starrycod/cogitum/lm-evaluation-harness/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for evaluating-llms-harness

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/starrycod/cogitum/lm-evaluation-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/starrycod/cogitum/lm-evaluation-harness.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 29 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,517 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00029 $0.03517
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.01407
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00703
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00352

Measured 1mo ago against content hash e332705b7369, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

evaluating-llms-harness scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Runs shell commandslowCapability

Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.

os.system(f"./eval_checkpoint.sh checkpoints step-{step}")
Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to evaluating-llms-harness — 29 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

cogitum/data/skills/mlops/evaluation/lm-evaluation-harness/SKILL.md · 499 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 499 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

lm-evaluation-harness - LLM Benchmarking

What's inside

Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.

Quick start

lm-evaluation-harness evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks using standardized prompts and metrics.

Installation:

pip install lm-eval

Evaluate any HuggingFace model:

lm_eval --model hf \
  --model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf \
  --tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag \
  --device cuda:0 \
  --batch_size 8

View available tasks:

lm_eval --tasks list

Common workflows

Workflow 1: Standard benchmark evaluation

Evaluate model on core benchmarks (MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval).

Copy this checklist:

Benchmark Evaluation:
- [ ] Step 1: Choose benchmark suite
- [ ] Step 2: Configure model
- [ ] Step 3: Run evaluation
- [ ] Step 4: Analyze results

Step 1: Choose benchmark suite

Core reasoning benchmarks:

  • MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) - 57 subjects, multiple choice
  • GSM8K - Grade school math word problems
  • HellaSwag - Common sense reasoning
  • TruthfulQA - Truthfulness and factuality
  • ARC (AI2 Reasoning Challenge) - Science questions

Code benchmarks:

  • HumanEval - Python code generation (164 problems)
  • MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) - Python coding

Standard suite (recommended for model releases):

--tasks mmlu,gsm8k,hellaswag,truthfulqa,arc_challenge

Step 2: Configure model

HuggingFace model:

lm_eval --model hf \
  --model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,dtype=bfloat16 \
  --tasks mmlu \
  --device cuda:0 \
  --batch_size auto  # Auto-detect optimal batch size

Quantized model (4-bit/8-bit):

lm_eval --model hf \
  --model_args pretrained=meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf,load_in_4bit=True \
  --tasks mmlu \
  --device cuda:0

Read the full file on GitHub · 499 lines

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 499 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A e332705b7369

Subscribe to this mod's changes

evaluating-llms-harness is a skill published in the GitHub repository StarryCod/cogitum (12 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 3,517 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). It is 92% identical to evaluating-llms-harness, differing in 29 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

audit-harness

Use when auditing HARNESS.md, pre-commit hooks, pre-push hooks, architecture gates, or CI workflows for tunacode-cli. This skill treats any mismatch, skipped gate, or failing check as a critical failure and requires manual one-by-one execution rather than make targets, batch wrappers, or summary-only audits.

alchemiststudiosDOTai/tunacode · 69 tokens

agent-builder

Build production-ready LLM agents with LangGraph, tool use, memory, streaming, and error handling. Use when designing or implementing an AI agent, multi-agent system, or agentic workflow.

chandrudp29/skillhub · 42 tokens

llm-evaluator

Evaluate LLM outputs systematically using LLM-as-judge, human evaluation frameworks, and regression testing. Use when assessing model quality, comparing models, or preventing quality regression.

chandrudp29/skillhub · 39 tokens

rag-evaluator

Evaluate RAG pipeline quality across faithfulness, relevance, and hallucination metrics. Use when user asks to test, benchmark, or improve a RAG system, or when RAG outputs look wrong.

chandrudp29/skillhub · 44 tokens

evaluating-llms-harness

Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.

NousResearch/hermes-agent · 29 tokens

darwinian-evolver

Evolve prompts/regex/SQL/code with Imbue's evolution loop.

NousResearch/hermes-agent · 22 tokens