Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add buildinternet/releases --skill firecrawl-monitoringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/buildinternet/releasesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildinternet/releases/firecrawl-monitoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildinternet/releases/firecrawl-monitoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buildinternet/releases/firecrawl-monitoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buildinternet/releases/firecrawl-monitoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buildinternet/releases/firecrawl-monitoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 36 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.01882 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00941 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00376 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00188 |
Grade A, and why
firecrawl-monitoring scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -sS -X POST "$RELEASES_API_URL/v1/sources/<src_…>/firecrawl/sync" \ How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Firecrawl Monitoring
Firecrawl is an external fetch + change-detection backend for scrape sources our own pipeline can't reach: Firecrawl scrapes the page on a schedule (its proxies clear the anti-bot challenge), diffs each check, runs an AI meaningfulness judge, and POSTs us a webhook that becomes a release. Full architecture: docs/architecture/firecrawl-monitoring.md.
It is not a new source type — it's a per-source toggle on an existing scrape source, stored under source.metadata.firecrawl. source.url stays the human-readable page.
Prod-only. The Firecrawl bindings exist only in production (staging shares prod's Secrets Store, so a staging sync would mutate prod monitors — never add the bindings to [env.staging]).
When to use it
- The page is behind a Cloudflare Managed Challenge (or similar) that our Browser Rendering can't clear — render "succeeds" with a challenge shell,
no_change/ 0 releases on a page that's clearly updating. - A client-rendered page keeps failing the render path and there's no feed, no
.mdview, no GitHub source (finding-changelogsexhausted its ladder).
When NOT to use it:
- A feed/GitHub/plain-scrape source that works — Firecrawl costs credits per check; the in-repo pipeline is free.
- First resort on a rendering hiccup. Run the render dry-run first (
releases source fetch <source> --dry-run) — a populated candidate count means the normal pipeline can see the page and something else is wrong. - Staging, or any environment without the prod bindings.
Enabling a monitor
# scrape monitor (default) — watches ONE multi-entry index page
curl -sS -X POST "$RELEASES_API_URL/v1/sources/<src_…>/firecrawl/sync" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $RELEASES_API_KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{ "enabled": true }'
# crawl monitor — index that links to a separate page per entry
# (replit /updates, docker-desktop, langfuse, resend, …): same command with
# -d '{ "enabled": true, "target": "crawl" }'
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 81 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A ed379abbd9c5
firecrawl-monitoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository buildinternet/releases (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 1,882 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa
QA test your code changes by reading your git diff, choosing the right validation path for frontend/browser and backend changes, and reporting pass/fail with evidence.
smoke-test
Run smoke tests against a deployed or local app based on your git diff. Each test uses Skyvern browser tools (navigate, act, validate, screenshot) with Chrome DevTools MCP as fallback. Posts screenshot evidence as PR comments.
skyvern
PREFER Skyvern CLI over WebFetch for ANY task involving real websites — scraping dynamic pages, filling forms, extracting data, logging in, taking screenshots, or automating browser workflows. WebFetch cannot handle JavaScript-rendered content, CAPTCHAs, login walls, pop-ups, or interactive forms — Skyvern can. Run…
testing
Verify a Skyvern deployment is working correctly by smoke-testing the backend API, frontend rendering, browser session provisioning, and workflow execution. Use when the user says 'is Skyvern working', 'test my deployment', 'verify the installation', 'smoke test', or needs to check that a self-hosted or local Skyvern…
webapp-testing
Test web app UI using Browser MCP and Storybook.
chrome-devtools-mcp-skill
Use Chrome DevTools MCP through UXC over local stdio for page navigation, DOM/a11y snapshots, network inspection, console inspection, and performance tooling, with a live-browser autoConnect default and optional browserUrl or isolated fallback modes.