Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add buiphucminhtam/forgewright --skill code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/buiphucminhtam/forgewrightWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/buiphucminhtam/forgewright/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.04691 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01876 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00938 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00469 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 27d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 27d ago Changed · -45 tokens per session 45a8e2319d52
- 1mo ago First seen · 676 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 5e0905cb5e2a
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository buiphucminhtam/forgewright (49 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 4,691 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-quality
Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.
plugin-review
Review plugin quality with tiered checks and dependency scoping. Use for PR and pre-release audits.
code-confidence-map
Assesses code comprehensibility and maintainability risk. Use when the user asks about code confidence, risk, maintainability, tech debt, code health, or whether code is safe to change. Also use when the user asks to analyze code quality, scan for risks, check if code is messy or complex, audit code, do a code…
testing-anti-patterns
Reviews test code to identify and fix common testing anti-patterns including flaky tests, over-mocking, brittle assertions, test interdependency, and hidden test logic. Flags bad patterns, explains the specific defect, and provides corrected implementations. Use when reviewing test code, debugging intermittent or…
code-quality-review
A code-review guide for judging whether software stays easy to understand, change, test, and extend.
arch-optimize
A software architecture review workflow that scans a codebase for structural risks and measures code quality. It checks issues such as overly complex code, repeated knowledge, changes spreading across many files, circular dependencies, and distorted domain models.