Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ByamB4/find-cve-agent --skill jwt-attacksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ByamB4/find-cve-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/byamb4/find-cve-agent/jwt-attacks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/byamb4/find-cve-agent/jwt-attacks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/byamb4/find-cve-agent/jwt-attacks.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00863 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00432 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
jwt-attacks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
JWT Attack Detection
When to Use
Audit JWT verification/generation libraries, authentication implementations, and any code that validates or creates JSON Web Tokens.
Attack Types
1. Algorithm Confusion (RS256 to HS256)
The server uses RS256 (asymmetric) but the attacker changes the token header to HS256 (symmetric) and signs with the public key as the HMAC secret.
Conditions: Library accepts algorithm from token header without allowlist validation.
2. alg:none Bypass
Token header specifies "alg": "none", and the library accepts unsigned tokens.
Conditions: Library does not validate algorithm or allows "none".
3. JWK Header Injection
Attacker embeds their own public key in the token header via the jwk parameter, and the library uses it for verification.
4. Weak HMAC Secrets
HMAC secrets that are short, common words, or default values. Can be brute-forced offline.
5. kid (Key ID) Attacks
- Path traversal:
"kid": "../../dev/null"-- sign with empty key - SQL injection:
"kid": "' UNION SELECT 'secret' --"-- inject known key - Command injection:
"kid": "|id"-- if kid is passed to shell
6. jku/x5u URL Manipulation
jku (JWK Set URL) or x5u (X.509 URL) in header points to attacker-controlled server hosting a JWK Set with the attacker key.
Process
Step 1: Find JWT Usage
grep -rn "jwt\.verify\|jwt\.decode\|jwt\.sign\|jwt\.encode" .
grep -rn "jsonwebtoken\|jose\|PyJWT\|go-jose\|nimbus-jose" .
grep -rn "JWTVerify\|jwtVerify\|createRemoteJWKSet" .
Step 2: Check Algorithm Validation
grep -rn "algorithms\|algorithm.*=\|alg.*:" . | grep -i jwt
Is the algorithm explicitly specified or taken from the token header?
// VULNERABLE: no algorithm specified
jwt.verify(token, key);
// SAFE: algorithm allowlist
jwt.verify(token, key, { algorithms: ['RS256'] });
Step 3: Check for none Algorithm
grep -rn "none\|None\|NONE" . | grep -i "alg\|algorithm"
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 115 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 436bee101df9
jwt-attacks is a skill published in the GitHub repository ByamB4/find-cve-agent (48 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 863 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
wordpress-plugin-hunt
Hunt WP plugins via REST, exploit CVEs when version known.
deep-invade
Deep pentest WP: SSRF, plugin CVE, JS mine, port scan chain.
zimbra-attack
Zimbra SOAP user enum, CVE-2022-37042, SSRF when webmail.
wp-plugin-cve-hunt
Systematic approach to finding and testing CVEs for identified WordPress plugins. Covers plugin discovery, version extraction from multiple sources (readme.txt, assets, inline JS), CVE database cross-referencing with WPScan/Patchstack/NVD/NVD API, version-based vulnerability matching, exploitation PoC generation, and…
analyzing-sbom-for-supply-chain-vulnerabilities
Parses Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) in CycloneDX and SPDX JSON formats to identify supply chain vulnerabilities by correlating components against the NVD CVE database via the NVD 2.0 API. Builds dependency graphs, calculates risk scores, identifies transitive vulnerability paths, and generates compliance reports.…
bug-bounty-hunting
Hunt vulnerabilities like an expert, not a linear software engineer: come at a target from the overlooked angle, reason by analogy and transfer proven attack mechanisms, attack the hidden assumptions and the seams between systems, drill to the mechanism, then keep it honest with proof and persistence (acceptance !=…