Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add CadeYu/vibe-harness --skill review-diffgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CadeYu/vibe-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cadeyu/vibe-harness/review-diff)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cadeyu/vibe-harness/review-diff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cadeyu/vibe-harness/review-diff/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cadeyu/vibe-harness/review-diff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cadeyu/vibe-harness/review-diff.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00400 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00160 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00080 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
review-diff scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Diff 审查
以高级工程师标准审查当前 diff。
触发时机
以下情况使用这个 skill：
- 代码或 docs 已发生改动。
- 某条 slice 被认为已经完成。
- 用户要求审查。
- handoff 需要风险评估。
必读材料
- 当前 diff。
docs/product.mddocs/architecture.mddocs/plans/active.md- 相关 tests。
- 如果可用，阅读命令输出。
流程
- 识别本次改动的行为契约。
- 优先检查正确性问题。
- 对照验收标准检查 tests。
- 对照
docs/architecture.md检查架构边界。 - 检查 docs 和 status 是否过期。
- 先输出问题项，按严重级别排序。
- 如果没有问题项，说明剩余风险和验证缺口。
问题项格式
每个问题项包含：
- 严重级别。
- 尽量包含文件路径和行号。
- 问题。
- 影响。
- 最小修复方式。
Review 重点
- 正确性 bug。
- 缺失 tests。
- 文档过期。
- 边界违规。
- 不安全操作。
- 数据模型错误。
- 错误处理缺口。
- 过度设计。
- 未使用代码。
- 没有验证证据的完成声明。
边界
- 除非明确要求，审查时不要重写代码。
- 不要把问题项埋在长摘要后面。
- 失败检查未解释清楚前，不要 approve work。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 145752e3f723
review-diff is a skill published in the GitHub repository CadeYu/vibe-harness (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 400 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…