cairn-loop-scope

A procedure for planning one small unit of work in a cairn-dev development loop. It checks the unit's surrounding work, accepted decisions, dependencies, and any existing task instructions before defining one testable success condition.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to scope a loop iteration, write its acceptance criterion, identify required earlier work, or stop and request maintainer input when the task cannot be defined safely.
Why use it?
It prevents work from expanding beyond its intended scope or colliding with related changes. When a prerequisite is missing, it redirects the work instead of pretending implementation can start.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/cairn-framework/cairn/cairn-loop-scope
Any agent
npx skills add cairn-framework/cairn --skill cairn-loop-scope
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cairn-framework/cairn

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 63 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 901 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00063 $0.00901
Opus 5 $0.00032 $0.00451
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00180
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00090

Measured 3d ago against content hash 621e9a0abbe5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cairn-loop-scope scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/cairn-loop-scope/SKILL.md · 86 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Scope one loop unit

Loaded by cairn-dev loop mode at its Scope step. Inputs: the selected unit (slug or finding code), its resolved node, its validated todo body when it has one, and the bound $CAIRN.

Declared exits, exactly one, as the last line you return to loop mode:

  • SCOPED: a success criterion is written and implementation may begin.
  • REROUTED: a prerequisite must land first; the tracker edits you made ARE this iteration, and loop mode goes straight to Land.
  • LOOP HALTED: the unit cannot be scoped without a maintainer.

1. Orient

$CAIRN neighbourhood <node> --include-todos --include-changes
$CAIRN rationale <node>
$CAIRN deps <node> --direction in --transitive

Read all three before deciding anything. The first shows what already claims this area, including an active change you must not collide with. The second is the accepted authority over the node. The third is the blast radius.

If the unit has a todo body, its Scope, Depends on, and Acceptance sections bind here. Where the body and your orientation disagree, the body is the contract and the disagreement is worth reporting in the summary.

2. Respect accepted decisions

An accepted decision covering the node constrains the implementation. You may not contradict one inside this iteration. If the unit cannot be done without contradicting an accepted decision, that is not a coding problem:

  • If the superseding decision is knowable, the gap IS the unit. Investigate, stress-test two to four options, persist a justified recommendation as a meta/ artefact, create a blocked tracker item, and return REROUTED so the package lands.
  • If it needs a ruling only the maintainer can give, do the same and say so plainly in the artefact. Never self-ratify a binding decision. A local-tier decision may be accepted only through the receipt protocol: two independent lens receipts bound to the subject hash and a ratified_by: machine marker when the loop signs (todo.decision-ratification-tiers).

Read the full file on GitHub · 86 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 86 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 621e9a0abbe5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cairn-loop-scope is a skill published in the GitHub repository cairn-framework/cairn (40 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 901 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens