Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/calionauta/stelownpx agentmods add skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-codebase-critiqueWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-codebase-critique)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-codebase-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-codebase-critique/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-codebase-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-codebase-critique.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00094 | $0.02830 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.01132 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00566 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00283 |
Grade A, and why
stelow-workflow-codebase-critique scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 291 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codebase Critique
Focus: Critically analyze source code structure — architecture, data flow, API contracts, performance, theming, responsive patterns, and AI slop in code. Input: Source code directory. Output: Classified gap report (🚨/🤔/🔎) with recommendations.
Tools: See
../stelow-workflow-orchestrator/references/cli-tools/subagents.mdfor subagent patterns.
Standalone awareness: inside stelow, quality gates critique depth (experimental → light, production → full). Standalone defaults to production quality (full single-reviewer). Works with any source directory — no stelow dependency for the audit logic.
Overview
Structural codebase critique — evaluates architecture, data flow, API contracts, performance, theming, responsive patterns, and AI slop in code.
This skill performs a source code audit using checklists focused on technical and structural aspects (non-visual):
| Dimension | What it evaluates |
|---|---|
| 🏗️ Architecture | Module structure, dependency flow, coupling |
| 🔄 Data Flow | Call chains, state management, event propagation |
| 📡 System Contracts | API definitions, error handling, logging |
| ⚡ Performance | Bundle size, re-renders, lazy loading |
| 🎨 Theming | Design tokens, dark mode support |
| 📱 Responsive | CSS breakpoints, media queries |
| 🤖 AI Slop in Code | Over-generated patterns, redundant code, boilerplate |
Important: This skill is for analyzing source code of components and logic.
If you need visual UI auditing (accessibility, design, UX), use
stelow-workflow-ux-critique em Codebase mode.
Quality Gate (auto-skip for small scopes)
Before running codebase critique, check if quality warrants it. Codebase critique is for structural analysis — if the scope is 1 file, the value is minimal.
# Read quality from stelow context or env var; default production (via canonical helper).
WF_DIR="$(ls -td .stelow/*/*/ 2>/dev/null | head -1)"
# shellcheck disable=SC1091
source "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]:-$0}")/../../stelow-workflow-orchestrator/references/cli-tools/read-config.sh"
QUALITY="${QUALITY:-$(stelow_read_quality)}"
DIFF_FILES=$(git diff --name-only HEAD~1 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
# Entity-level gate when sem is available (files undercount refactors that touch few files broadly)
DIFF_ENTITIES=$(sem diff --format json HEAD~1 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(len(json.load(sys.stdin).get('entities', [])))" 2>/dev/null || echo "$DIFF_FILES")
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago Changed · +5 lines 7d657033fecc
- 1mo ago Changed · -1 lines ccddf5419d1f
- 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines 08e2db64347c
- 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines be82aea381d3
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 5ffcb5249e24
- 1mo ago Changed · +26 lines 6537724f9889
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines 48ad57d9a1ac
- 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines 9df9220a180a
- 2mo ago First seen · 238 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A 3ff418b23ce2
stelow-workflow-codebase-critique is a skill published in the GitHub repository calionauta/stelow (14 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 2,830 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
stelow-workflow-codebase-critique compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| stelow-workflow-codebase-critiquecalionauta/stelow | Skill | 14 | 9d ago | MIT | A | 94 | Claude Code, Codex |
| autoreviewopenclaw/clawhub | Skill | 9.5k | yesterday | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills | Skill | 2.2k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code, Codex |
| omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermes | Skill | 5.2k | yesterday | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |
| revdiff-planumputun/revdiff | Skill | 945 | yesterday | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code |
| explore-unknownsdzhng/skills | Skill | 1.4k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 162 | Claude Code, Codex |
| re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin | Skill | 1.4k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code |