stelow-workflow-execution-critique

stelow-workflow-execution-critique is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from calionauta/stelow. It costs 92 tokens per session (3,644 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A structured review of completed software work, plans, directories, or URLs. It checks changes against the available source of truth, such as a technical plan, while also working when no project workflow directory exists.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit an implementation, review a technical plan against code, inspect changes in a directory, or critique work supplied through a URL.
Why use it?
It helps uncover problems after implementation and adapts its review to the project information available. It can compare entity-level code changes when its specialised comparison tool is present, with a standard version-control comparison as fallback.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents; mentions AGENTS.md.

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is **Tools:** See `../stelow-workflow-orchestrator/references/cli-tools/subagents.md` for subagent patterns..

Good fit Use it to audit an implementation, review a technical plan against code, inspect changes in a directory, or critique work supplied through a URL.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/calionauta/stelow
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-execution-critique

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for stelow-workflow-execution-critique

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-execution-critique/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-execution-critique)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-execution-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-execution-critique/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for stelow-workflow-execution-critique

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-execution-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/calionauta/stelow/stelow-workflow-execution-critique.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 92 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,644 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00092 $0.03644
Opus 5 $0.00046 $0.01822
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00729
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00364

Measured yesterday against content hash 4e920fd9865b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

stelow-workflow-execution-critique scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/stelow-workflow-execution-critique/SKILL.md · 424 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 424 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Execution Critique

sem diff is the primary diff tool. When sem is available, always use sem diff first for entity-level change detection (functions, types, methods). Use git diff only as fallback when sem is absent. The entire skill follows this convention — the fallback table in Tool Availability covers every sem command's git equivalent.

Standalone awareness: when inside stelow, reads scope + mode from .stelow/*/plans/spec-tech*.md and stelow.json. When standalone, auto-detects input type (plan path, directory, URL, or nothing). The HAS_WORKFLOW_DIR flag gates stelow-specific features; all audit criteria work in both modes.

Overview

Run a structured audit after any implementation — whether it followed the full stelow or was done ad-hoc. Every evaluation criterion runs in every mode; only the source of truth differs based on what input is available.

Tools: See ../stelow-workflow-orchestrator/references/cli-tools/subagents.md for subagent patterns. For large outputs, use bash with output truncation, or read with offset/limit.


🔀 Input Detection

Detect the input type before proceeding:

Input received:
  ├── Is a path ending in spec-tech*.md?
  │   └→ 🗺️ Mode: Workflow Audit (source of truth = plan scopes)
  ├── Is a path ending in spec-product*.md or spec-*.md?
  │   └→ 📋 Mode: Plan Audit (source of truth = product spec)
  ├── Is a directory path or URL?
  │   └→ 📁 Mode: Context Audit (source of truth = sem diff + git + session)
  ├── User described what changed verbally?
  │   └→ Use description to scope the audit. Still run sem diff / git diff
  │      to auto-discover changes, but use inline text as the primary
  │      scope anchor for what to evaluate.
  └── NOTHING / no input?
      └→ 💻 Mode: Standalone Audit (source of truth = auto-discovered)
         Run: sem diff HEAD~1 (or git fallback), git diff, session file list
         If nothing found: ask "What changed?"

Read the full file on GitHub · 424 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday Changed · -364 lines 4e920fd9865b
  2. 10d ago First seen · 788 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 0f3483e12026

Subscribe to this mod's changes

stelow-workflow-execution-critique is a skill published in the GitHub repository calionauta/stelow (10 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 3,644 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.