Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add calm-north/seojuice-skills --skill briefgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/calm-north/seojuice-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/calm-north/seojuice-skills/brief)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/calm-north/seojuice-skills/brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/calm-north/seojuice-skills/brief/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/calm-north/seojuice-skills/brief"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/calm-north/seojuice-skills/brief.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk warn
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.02540 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01270 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00508 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00254 |
Grade A, and why
brief scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 260 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Content Brief
Produce a complete, editor-ready content brief covering intent analysis, competitive SERP review, content outline, E-E-A-T requirements, and SEO targets.
Before You Start
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
- Target keyword or topic. The primary keyword this content should rank for.
- Business context. What does the company do? What should readers do after reading (sign up, buy, contact)?
- Content type preference. Blog post, landing page, guide, comparison, tutorial?
- Audience. Who is reading this? Beginners, practitioners, decision-makers?
Step 1: SERP Analysis
Analyze what currently ranks for the target keyword:
- Search the keyword (use web search) and review the top 5-10 results.
- Identify the dominant intent. Are results informational guides, product pages, listicles, tools?
- Note the content format. Average word count, heading structure, use of images/tables/videos.
- Find the gaps. What do all top results cover? What do none of them cover well?
Record:
| Rank | Title | URL | Format | Approx. Length | Unique Angle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ... | ... | guide / listicle / tutorial | ... | ... |
Step 2: Intent Mapping
Determine the exact user intent and map it to content structure:
- "How to" intent → Step-by-step tutorial with numbered sections
- "What is" intent → Definition + context + examples + next steps
- "Best X" intent → Curated list with comparison criteria and recommendations
- "X vs Y" intent → Side-by-side comparison table + verdict
- "Review" intent → Hands-on evaluation with pros/cons/alternatives
The content structure must match what the searcher expects to find.
Step 3: Content Outline
Build a detailed outline with:
Title Options (2-3 variants)
Select the formula that matches the content type:
| Content Type | Formula | Example |
|---|---|---|
| How-to / Tutorial | "How to [Goal] in [Timeframe]" | "How to Fix Crawl Errors in 30 Minutes" |
| How-to (objection) | "How to [Goal] Without [Objection]" | "How to Build Links Without Cold Outreach" |
| Listicle | "[N] [Adjective] [Topic] [Qualifier]" | "9 Proven Link Building Strategies for SaaS" |
| Comparison | "[A] vs [B]: Which Is Better for [Goal]?" | "Ahrefs vs SEMrush: Which Is Better for Keyword Research?" |
| Definition | "What Is [Topic]? [Short Clarifier]" | "What Is Topical Authority? How It Affects Rankings" |
| Ultimate guide | "The [Complete/Definitive] Guide to [Topic]" | "The Complete Guide to Technical SEO" |
| Mistakes | "[N] [Topic] Mistakes [Consequence]" | "7 Internal Linking Mistakes That Kill Rankings" |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 260 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 701923905a58
brief is a skill published in the GitHub repository calm-north/seojuice-skills (21 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 2,540 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
content-amplifier
Use when the user asks to "amplify influencer content with paid media", "set up whitelisting or Spark Ads", "decide which posts to boost", "repurpose influencer content", "turn one video into multiple ads", or "build a UGC asset library"; produces (paid mode) a content-selection scorecard, a paid amplification…
cold-outbound-sequencer
Use when the user asks to "build a B2B cold-outbound sequence", "design reply-triage branching", "plan a domain warmup / sending throttle", or "make my outbound CAN-SPAM / opt-in compliant"; produces a multi-step outbound sequence with reply-triage branches (positive / objection / referral / not-now / opt-out), a…
inbox-placement-monitor
Use when the user asks to "track where my emails are actually landing after I send", "read my seed-list inbox vs spam vs promotions results", "trend my Gmail Postmaster / Microsoft SNDS reputation", or "did placement drop after my last send"; produces a per-provider inbox/spam/promotions placement read, a domain/IP…
email-creative-builder
Use when the user asks to "write the email", "draft subject lines", or "build email creative"; produces the pre-click unit — subject-line variants + preheader, body copy, one clear CTA, and a plain-text alt — message-matched to the destination page and claims-ledger-aware. Not for pre-scoring or ranking subject-line…
newsletter-monetization-planner
Use when the user asks to "monetize my newsletter", "build a sponsorship rate card", or "model paid-subscription revenue"; produces a revenue model (paid tiers, ad/sponsorship inventory + CPM/flat rate card, referral/boost loops), a list-growth ↔ revenue projection, and honest-offer / disclosure checks for the SEND-D…
contract-helper
Use when the user asks to "draft an influencer contract", "review these agreement terms", or "build a partnership template"; produces a full influencer agreement framework (scope, compensation, usage rights, exclusivity, FTC disclosure), a clause-by-clause review with red flags, and a negotiation cheat sheet. Not for…