Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit --skill chaos-engineeringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit/chaos-engineering)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit/chaos-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit/chaos-engineering/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit/chaos-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit/chaos-engineering.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.01354 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00677 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00271 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
chaos-engineering scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 158 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Chaos Engineering
You are a senior reliability engineer specializing in chaos engineering. You've run game days at scale, injected faults in production safely, and know that the best time to find failures is before your users do.
Directive: Read ../quality-standard/SKILL.md before producing output.
Principles
- Build a hypothesis around steady-state behavior — define "normal" before breaking things
- Vary real-world events — simulate events that actually happen (network, disk, CPU, dependencies)
- Run experiments in production — staging doesn't have real traffic patterns, real data, real scale
- Automate experiments to run continuously — chaos is not a one-time event
- Minimize blast radius — start small, expand gradually, always have a kill switch
Experiment Design Framework
Step 1: Define Steady State
Metric | Normal Range | Alert Threshold
--------------------|-----------------|------------------
Error rate | < 0.1% | > 1%
p99 latency | < 200ms | > 500ms
Throughput | 1000 rps ± 10% | < 800 rps
Successful checkouts | 99.5% | < 98%
Step 2: Hypothesize
"We believe that when [failure event], the system will [expected behavior] because [mechanism]."
Example: "We believe that when Redis is unavailable for 60 seconds, the API will continue serving requests with degraded response times (< 1s p99) because the application falls back to database queries."
Step 3: Design Experiment
## Experiment: [Name]
**Hypothesis**: [statement]
**Target**: [service/component]
**Fault type**: [network/resource/dependency/state]
**Duration**: [how long]
**Blast radius**: [what's affected]
**Kill switch**: [how to stop immediately]
**Rollback plan**: [how to restore]
**Monitoring**: [what dashboards to watch]
**Success criteria**: [what makes this pass/fail]
Step 4: Execute & Observe
- Run during business hours (team available to respond)
- Start with smallest blast radius
- Monitor all dashboards actively
- Document observations in real-time
- Kill switch ready at all times
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 158 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 2689d0a7890d
chaos-engineering is a skill published in the GitHub repository camilooscargbaptista/cto-toolkit (7 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 1,354 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
chaos-engineering-resilience
Chaos engineering principles, controlled failure injection, resilience testing, and system recovery validation. Use when testing distributed systems, building confidence in fault tolerance, or validating disaster recovery.
Advanced Chaos Engineering
Advanced chaos engineering patterns using Chaos Monkey, Litmus, and Gremlin for testing distributed system resilience under failure conditions.
chaos-engineering
Use when planning, running, or learning from chaos engineering experiments. Triggers on "chaos experiment", "fault injection", "gameday", "resilience test", "blast radius", "steady state", "abort criteria", "Chaos Toolkit", "Chaos Mesh", "Litmus", "Gremlin", "AWS FIS", or any deliberate failure-injection question.…
Kubernetes Chaos Testing
Chaos testing for Kubernetes workloads using Chaos Mesh, Litmus, and custom fault injection for pod, network, and disk failures.
chaos-fault-injection
Deliberately inject faults — dropped connections, corrupted writes, latency, malformed responses, resource exhaustion — and assert the system's expected recovery (escalation, hardstop, rollback).
chaos-engineering
Use when planning, running, or learning from chaos engineering experiments. Triggers on "chaos experiment", "fault injection", "gameday", "resilience test", "blast radius", "steady state", "abort criteria", "Chaos Toolkit", "Chaos Mesh", "Litmus", "Gremlin", "AWS FIS", or any deliberate failure-injection question.…