Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/camusgit/evoquant/paper-reviewnpx skills add CamusGIT/EvoQuant --skill paper-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CamusGIT/EvoQuantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/camusgit/evoquant/paper-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/camusgit/evoquant/paper-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/camusgit/evoquant/paper-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00152 | $0.02222 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00076 | $0.01111 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00444 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00222 |
Grade A, and why
paper-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 209 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Paper Review
A systematic approach to self-reviewing academic papers before submission. Covers a 5-aspect review checklist, reverse-outlining for structural clarity, figure/table quality checks, and rebuttal preparation.
When to Use This Skill
- User wants to review or check a paper draft before submission
- User asks for feedback on paper quality or completeness
- User wants to prepare for potential reviewer criticism
- User mentions "review paper", "check my draft", "self-review"
If the user has already received reviewer comments and needs to write a rebuttal, use the
paper-rebuttalskill instead.
Prerequisites
Before starting review, confirm the paper-writing handoff checklist is satisfied: all sections drafted, claims anchored to evidence, limitation section present, figures finalized, and no unresolved \todo{} markers. If any item is incomplete, finish writing before reviewing.
The Perfectionist Approach
Strive for perfection: review your own paper, consider every question a reviewer might ask, and address them one by one.
The best defense against negative reviews is a thorough self-review:
- Adversarial review: Read your own paper as a critical reviewer would
- Seek advisor feedback: Ask your advisor to review — the more feedback, the better
- Address everything: For every potential weakness you find, either fix it or prepare a defense
Counterintuitive Review Protocol
Run this protocol before final polishing:
- Reject-first simulation: Force yourself to write a one-paragraph reject summary before writing any positive comments.
- Delete one unsupported strong claim: If a strong claim lacks direct evidence, remove it instead of defending it.
- Score trust, not only score gains: Papers with slightly lower gains but higher fairness and reproducibility often receive better review outcomes.
- Promote one explicit limitation: Move one meaningful limitation from hidden notes into the paper; transparency can increase confidence.
- Attack your novelty claim: Ask "Could a strong PhD derive this in one afternoon?" If yes, narrow and sharpen the novelty statement.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 209 lines · 152 tokens per session scan A d8333bdd1177
paper-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository CamusGIT/EvoQuant (215 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 152 tokens to every session and 2,222 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
labrat-operator
Use when operating a labrat lab with Codex: checking health, choosing the next phase prompt, supervising runtime cycles, auditing candidates, synthesizing recent evaluations, or writing checkpoint notes.
research-innovation-explorer
Build literature-grounded research-question candidate landscapes by collecting papers, generating A+B matrices, and dynamically reviewing combinations with traceable evidence, uncertainty, and next checks. Use when an AI agent needs to explore a field, screen research questions, compare paper combinations, inspect…
research-routes-explore
Explore open-ended scientific or product questions through multiple concurrent Research Routes branches, probes, experiments, observations, evidence polarity, failure regimes, unknowns, and mature-method comparators. Use for research exploration or hybrid discovery from any starting point while keeping a route-neutral…
academic-researcher
Academic research assistant for literature reviews, paper analysis, and scholarly writing. Use when: reviewing academic papers, conducting literature reviews, writing research summaries, analyzing methodologies, formatting citations, or when user mentions academic research, scholarly writing, papers, or scientific…
init-analysis
This skill should be used when the user asks to "run initial analysis", "analyze single-cell data", "QC my data", "run bioinformatics pipeline", "generate analysis report", "explore my dataset", "do exploratory data analysis", "initial data analysis", or needs to perform quality control, dimensionality reduction…
pb-weather
Weather-aware running advice — forecast, air quality, and how to adjust today's run.