Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add CamusGIT/EvoQuant --skill paper-writinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CamusGIT/EvoQuantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/camusgit/evoquant/paper-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/camusgit/evoquant/paper-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/camusgit/evoquant/paper-writing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/camusgit/evoquant/paper-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/camusgit/evoquant/paper-writing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00124 | $0.02324 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00050 | $0.00930 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00465 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00232 |
Grade A, and why
paper-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to paper-writing — 17 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Paper Writing
A systematic 11-step workflow for writing academic papers, with section-specific templates and battle-tested writing principles.
When to Use This Skill
- User asks to write or draft a paper or paper section
- User needs LaTeX templates for Abstract, Introduction, Method, Experiments, etc.
- User wants to improve academic writing quality
- User mentions "paper writing", "write introduction", "draft method section", etc.
Artifact Sources
If you used upstream skills earlier in the pipeline, pull these artifacts before writing:
| Source Skill | Artifact | Used In |
|---|---|---|
paper-planning |
Story summary (task → challenge → insight → contribution → advantage) | Steps 1-2 (Introduction writing plan) |
paper-planning |
Module Motivation Mapping table | Step 3 (Method subsections) |
paper-planning |
Experiment plan (comparisons + ablations + demos) | Step 5 (Experiments section) |
paper-planning |
Pipeline figure sketch | Steps 1, 6 (Method overview figure) |
paper-planning |
Claim-to-experiment mapping | Steps 2, 5 (Abstract, Introduction, Experiments) |
paper-planning |
Fallback narrative (if planned) | Steps 7-8 (Introduction / Conclusion pivot) |
experiment-pipeline |
Stage 1-4 results, ablation tables, trajectory logs | Step 5 (write experiments) |
experiment-craft |
Failure analysis, implementation tricks | Step 3 (Method section), Step 9 (limitations) |
The 11-Step Writing Process
Follow these steps in order. Each step builds on the previous one.
- Draw a pipeline figure sketch — Sketch the method's pipeline figure to clarify the overall approach. The figure highlights novelty, not just explanation.
- Design the story and plan experiments — Outline the paper's story (core contribution, module motivations). List comparison experiments and ablation studies. Draft an Introduction writing plan.
- Write Method — Organize the Method writing plan, then draft Method. Run experiments in parallel.
- Revise Introduction and Method — Iterate on both sections while experiments continue.
- Write Experiments — Once experiments are mostly done, organize the Experiments writing plan, then draft.
- Polish figures — Finalize the pipeline figure. Create the teaser figure.
- Write Related Work — List related papers, group into topics, write paragraphs.
- Review the paper — Self-review Introduction, Method, and Experiments. Use the
paper-reviewskill. - Write Abstract — Organize the Abstract writing plan, then draft.
- Choose the title — List important keywords, then compose an informative title.
- Iterate — Repeatedly review and revise the entire paper.
What ships with it
11 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/paper-skeleton.tex 4.9 KB
- assets/table-style.tex 3.0 KB
- references/abstract-templates.md 3.4 KB
- references/counterintuitive-writing.md 2.4 KB
- references/experiments-guide.md 7.9 KB
- references/introduction-templates.md 8.5 KB
- references/method-templates.md 6.6 KB
- references/related-work-guide.md 2.9 KB
- references/supplementary-guide.md 2.9 KB
- references/writing-practice.md 2.4 KB
- references/writing-principles.md 4.3 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 188 lines · 124 tokens per session scan A 9e56f789721d
paper-writing is a skill published in the GitHub repository CamusGIT/EvoQuant (141 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 124 tokens to every session and 2,324 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to paper-writing, differing in 17 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
relax-dev-debug
Develop and debug the Relax reinforcement learning project. Use this skill whenever modifying code in the relax/ directory, or running remote training jobs on a Ray cluster for validation. Also use it when the user mentions training, debugging training runs, submitting Ray jobs, or fixing training errors.
access-gevety-health-biomarker-data
Access your Gevety health data - biomarkers, healthspan scores, biological age, supplements, activities, daily actions, 90-day health protocol, and upcoming tests.
aminer-open-academic-search
ACADEMIC PRIORITY: Activate this skill whenever the user's query involves academic, scholarly, or research-related topics — including but not limited to: papers, publications, citations, scholars, researchers, professors, institutions, universities, labs, journals, conferences,…
acorn-theorem-prover-verifier
Verify and write proofs using the Acorn theorem prover for mathematical and cryptographic formalization. Use when working with Acorn proof files (.ac), verifying theorems, formalizing mathematical or cryptographic protocols, or writing proofs in the Acorn language. Triggers on:…
ds-optimize
Use when an algorithm-first quest should manage candidate briefs, optimization frontier, branch promotion, or fusion-aware search instead of the paper-oriented default loop.
inno-grant-proposal
A writing and editing aid for grant proposals submitted to major United States and Chinese research agencies. It covers proposal sections such as specific aims, research justification, and broader impacts.