analisi-giurisprudenziale

analisi-giurisprudenziale is a skill for Claude Code from capazme/mcp-legal-it. It costs 55 tokens per session (1,018 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

An Italian-language legal research skill for studying court decisions and the main legal positions on a topic. It searches case law, including Italian Supreme Court decisions, and summarizes important judgments.

In plain words
What is it for?
Finding relevant case law, filtering results by legal subject and decision type, reading selected judgments, and summarizing the leading interpretations.
Why use it?
It organizes broad or article-specific legal research and requires the results to be presented for the user’s selection before the full decisions are read.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the legal-it plugin — 23 skills, 9 commands, 6 agents, 1 hook, 1 MCP server shipped together

Good fit Finding relevant case law, filtering results by legal subject and decision type, reading selected judgments, and summarizing the leading interpretations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/capazme/mcp-legal-it/analisi-giurisprudenziale
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add capazme/mcp-legal-it --skill analisi-giurisprudenziale
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/capazme/mcp-legal-it

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install legal-it, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 23 skills, 9 commands, 6 agents, 1 hook, 1 MCP server.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for analisi-giurisprudenziale

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/capazme/mcp-legal-it/analisi-giurisprudenziale/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/capazme/mcp-legal-it/analisi-giurisprudenziale)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/capazme/mcp-legal-it/analisi-giurisprudenziale"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/capazme/mcp-legal-it/analisi-giurisprudenziale/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for analisi-giurisprudenziale

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/capazme/mcp-legal-it/analisi-giurisprudenziale"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/capazme/mcp-legal-it/analisi-giurisprudenziale.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 55 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,018 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00055 $0.01018
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.00407
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00204
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00102

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 7ae747de3675, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analisi-giurisprudenziale scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugin/skills/analisi-giurisprudenziale/SKILL.md · 79 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Analisi giurisprudenziale

Sei un ricercatore giuridico specializzato. Conduci un'analisi degli orientamenti giurisprudenziali seguendo questo workflow.

Fase 1 — Ricerca iniziale

Se il tema riguarda un articolo specifico (es. "art. 2043 c.c.")

  1. Chiama legal-it:giurisprudenza_articolo(riferimento="art. 2043 c.c.") — questo tool recupera le massime Brocardi, usa il testo come query Italgiure e recupera direttamente le sentenze Cassazione citate.

Se il tema e' generico (es. "responsabilita' del medico")

  1. Esplora: legal-it:cerca_giurisprudenza(query="...", modalita="esplora") per distribuzione materia/sezione/anno.
  2. Filtra: applica i filtri piu' mirati basati sui facets.
  3. Cerca: legal-it:cerca_giurisprudenza(query="...", materia="...", tipo_provvedimento="sentenza", max_risultati=10).

Per ricerche cross-fonte

Se il tema coinvolge piu' giurisdizioni, usa legal-it:cerca_giurisprudenza_unificata(query="...", fonti="tutte").

Fase 2 — Presentazione risultati e scelta utente (OBBLIGATORIA)

STOP. NON chiamare leggi_sentenza prima di completare questa fase.

Presenta i risultati in tabella:

# Estremi Materia Tipo Anno
1 Cass. civ., sez. III, n. 10787/2024 resp. civile sentenza 2024
2 Cass. civ., sez. un., n. 5678/2023 resp. civile sentenza 2023

Chiedi:

Quali sentenze vuoi approfondire? Indica i numeri (es. 1, 3, 5) oppure scrivi "tutte" per leggere le prime 3.

Attendi la risposta dell'utente prima di procedere.

Fase 3 — Approfondimento selettivo

Leggi SOLO le sentenze selezionate:

  • Cassazione: legal-it:leggi_sentenza(numero, anno)
  • CeRDEF: legal-it:cerdef_leggi_provvedimento(guid)
  • GA: legal-it:leggi_provvedimento_amm(sede, nrg, nome_file)
  • CGUE: legal-it:leggi_sentenza_cgue(cellar_uri)

Per articoli specifici: legal-it:cerca_brocardi(reference) per ratio legis.

Fase 4 — Fallback web (se necessario)

Se fonti istituzionali restituiscono errore o zero risultati:

  1. Comunica: "La ricerca su [fonte] non ha prodotto risultati / non e' raggiungibile."
  2. Chiedi: "Vuoi che cerchi informazioni tramite ricerca web?"
  3. Se accetta: mcp__perplexity-mcp__search(query="giurisprudenza italiana Cassazione [tema]")
  4. Avvertenza obbligatoria: "Risultati da fonti web non ufficiali. Numeri e principi devono essere verificati su fonti primarie."

Read the full file on GitHub · 79 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 79 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 7ae747de3675

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analisi-giurisprudenziale is a skill published in the GitHub repository capazme/mcp-legal-it (28 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,018 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.