Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add capazme/mcp-legal-it --skill parere-legalegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/capazme/mcp-legal-itWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/capazme/mcp-legal-it/parere-legale)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/capazme/mcp-legal-it/parere-legale"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/capazme/mcp-legal-it/parere-legale/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/capazme/mcp-legal-it/parere-legale"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/capazme/mcp-legal-it/parere-legale.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00651 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00260 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00130 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
parere-legale scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Workflow Parere Legale
Segui questi step nell'ordine. Usa i tool MCP di Legal IT.
Step 1 — Analisi del quesito
Identifica:
- Questione giuridica principale
- Norme potenzialmente applicabili (codice civile, leggi speciali, regolamenti UE)
- Parti coinvolte e loro posizioni
- Fatti rilevanti
Step 2 — Verifica normativa
Per OGNI norma che intendi citare nel parere:
- Chiama
legal-it:cite_lawcon il riferimento (es. "art. X legge Y") per ottenere il testo vigente - Se serve approfondimento dottrinale: chiama
legal-it:cerca_brocardi
MAI citare una norma a memoria. Ogni citazione deve avere un legal-it:cite_law corrispondente.
Step 3 — Ricerca giurisprudenziale
Per le questioni controverse o con orientamenti divergenti:
- Chiama
legal-it:cerca_giurisprudenzacon il tema specifico per trovare le sentenze rilevanti - Per le top 2-3 sentenze piu pertinenti: chiama
legal-it:leggi_sentenzacon numero e anno per il testo integrale - Identifica l'orientamento prevalente (consolidato, in evoluzione, contrasto)
Step 4 — Redazione del parere
Struttura il parere nelle seguenti sezioni:
FATTO
Riassumi i fatti rilevanti come esposti dal cliente.
DIRITTO
Esponi il quadro normativo applicabile, citando:
- Articoli di legge (con testo recuperato da
legal-it:cite_law) - Principi giurisprudenziali (con numero e anno delle sentenze)
- Dottrina rilevante (se emersa da
legal-it:cerca_brocardi)
ANALISI
Applica il diritto ai fatti:
- Sussunzione dei fatti nelle fattispecie normative
- Valutazione dei pro e contro per le diverse tesi
- Rischi e incertezze
CONCLUSIONI
- Risposta al quesito in termini chiari
- Raccomandazioni operative
- Eventuali azioni da intraprendere con tempistiche
Note
- Ogni norma citata DEVE avere un
legal-it:cite_lawnel transcript - Ogni sentenza citata DEVE essere stata letta con
legal-it:leggi_sentenza - Segnalare chiaramente quando un'interpretazione è controversa
- Distinguere tra orientamento consolidato e orientamento minoritario
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 59 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 4920723ba6f2
parere-legale is a skill published in the GitHub repository capazme/mcp-legal-it (28 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 651 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
korean-law
A legal research connection to South Korea's official law information service. It can retrieve statutes, court decisions, administrative rules, local ordinances, treaties, and legal interpretations, then check cited provisions against the source.
grc-compliance
Build ServiceNow GRC — sncompliancepolicy lifecycle, sncompliancecontrol tests, snriskrisk assessment with inherent/residual scoring, audit engagements, and findings remediation.
vendor-management
Manage ServiceNow vendors and contracts — corecompany vendor records, astcontract with renewal alerts, astcontractsla performance tracking, vendorriskassessment scoring, and vendor scorecards.
lawyer-expert
Expert-level legal systems, contracts, compliance, and legal technology. Use when the user mentions legal, contracts, compliance, law, or legal tech, or when the task involves Legal Systems, Legal Technology, Compliance Frameworks, or Contract Management.
tw-legal-rag
A tool for finding real Taiwan court judgments and legal interpretations with verifiable citations before answering questions about Taiwan law.
voice-clone-lab
A consent-controlled tool for creating a reusable synthetic voice from a local speaker recording.