platform-engineering

platform-engineering is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from cass-2003/local-workflow-skill. It costs 112 tokens per session (8,901 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide to building internal platforms that give developers standard paths to create, deploy, operate, and support services. It covers developer portals, service catalogs, templates, self-service workflows, access controls, and platform measurement.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to plan or assess an internal developer platform, Golden Paths, service catalogs, self-service delivery, governance rules, support models, and migration plans.
Why use it?
It helps platform teams design around developer journeys and measurable outcomes instead of only assembling a collection of tools.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to plan or assess an internal developer platform, Golden Paths, service catalogs, self-service delivery, governance rules, support models, and migration plans.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/cass-2003/local-workflow-skill/platform-engineering
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add cass-2003/local-workflow-skill --skill platform-engineering
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cass-2003/local-workflow-skill

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for platform-engineering

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cass-2003/local-workflow-skill/platform-engineering/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cass-2003/local-workflow-skill/platform-engineering)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cass-2003/local-workflow-skill/platform-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cass-2003/local-workflow-skill/platform-engineering/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for platform-engineering

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cass-2003/local-workflow-skill/platform-engineering"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cass-2003/local-workflow-skill/platform-engineering.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 112 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 8,901 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00112 $0.08901
Opus 5 $0.00056 $0.04450
Sonnet 5 $0.00022 $0.01780
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00890

Measured 6d ago against content hash 4ded0074888b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

platform-engineering scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/cloud-infra/community/platform-engineering/SKILL.md · 348 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 348 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

平台工程

首次自称:平台工程(platform-engineering,兼容 slug: plt)。 requires 仅表示条件联动:只有当前任务已经明确需要发布、观测、云原生或相邻能力时,才把相关技能升级为 must;不得把 manifest requires 写成自动必选。

定位:把平台工程从“装门户/堆工具/写模板”拉回平台产品:用户是谁、能力边界是什么、入口如何闭环、执行面是否可追踪、证据能否证明 DevEx 与治理同时改善。 铁律:没有用户旅程、服务目录事实、执行面链路、权限/租户模型、指标基线、支持闭环和迁移/弃用策略,不得宣布 IDP、Golden Path 或 self-service 成熟。

快速总则(用户 / 能力 / 入口 / 证据)

  1. 用户:先分清应用开发、SRE、平台团队、安全、FinOps、合规、运营、管理者;每类用户的目标、痛点、权限、交互模式和支持路径不同。
  2. 平台产品:先定义平台消费者、平台提供的产品/能力、非目标和边界;只上线工具或模板仓库不等于平台工程。
  3. 能力:区分 Portal、Service Catalog、templates、workflow/orchestrator、CI/CD、GitOps、IaC、Kubernetes 平台、policy、observability、FinOps、support;不要把入口当能力。
  4. 入口:确认 Backstage/Port/Cortex/OpsLevel/自研门户、CLI、API、ChatOps、CI 模板、GitOps PR、云控制台哪一个是主入口,入口后必须能追到执行面。
  5. 证据:结论绑定 adoption、onboarding time、lead time、change failure rate、MTTR、工单量、满意度、SPACE 信号、scorecard 趋势、catalog drift、成本标签覆盖率。
  6. 版本:确认 Backstage/插件、scaffolder、catalog schema、CI runner、IaC provider、GitOps controller、K8s、policy engine、身份源版本。
  7. 环境:确认组织/团队/租户、云账号/project/namespace、RBAC、网络隔离、Secret、制品库、日志索引、成本中心、合规等级。
  8. 复现:按用户旅程复现创建服务、首次部署、申请资源、发布、观测、扩缩容、故障定位、回滚、清理资源。
  9. Golden Path:必须覆盖 repo、模板、测试、CI、artifact、deploy、config、secret、observability、SLO、runbook、security、cost、rollback、owner。
  10. Guardrails:治理落到模板、CI/CD、IaC plan、admission/runtime policy、scorecard、审计和例外到期,不只写文档。
  11. 平台即产品:必须有 roadmap、用户反馈、支持 SLO、release notes、迁移计划、弃用策略、adoption funnel 和 owner。
  12. 认知负担:用默认值、分层参数、渐进披露、错误解释、文档同源和支持入口降低复杂度,不能把云/K8s 复杂度换成门户表单复杂度。
  13. 服务目录真实性:Catalog 必须能被 repo、CI、runtime、APM、云资源和 on-call 证据反查;只靠人工 yaml 或门户表单不算可信。
  14. 执行面闭环:任何 self-service 按钮、模板或 API 都要能追踪到 workflow run、CI job、GitOps commit、IaC plan/apply、审计日志和最终资源状态。
  15. 开发者平台门禁:平台能力进入生产默认要过 identity、RBAC、tenant、quota、environment、credential、policy、SLO、cost、audit、rollback、migration 和 support gate。
  16. 真实交付:不能只证明按钮可点或模板可生成;必须证明服务能创建、部署、观测、告警、回滚、升级、删除,并能被 owner 接手运营。

强制落地流程

  1. 先定平台产品:目标用户、要卖给内部团队的能力、非目标、成功指标、支持边界和 owner。
  2. 再读事实:服务目录、仓库、CI/CD、GitOps、IaC、runtime、权限、工单、事故、成本和绕行路径。
  3. 再画旅程:从创建服务到上线、观测、故障、扩容、回滚、升级、删除,每一步标入口、等待、失败点和证据。
  4. 再定控制面:Portal/CLI/API 只做入口,真实状态以 workflow/GitOps/IaC/runtime 的单一事实源为准。
  5. 再定权限链:identity、team、tenant、role、approval、runner token、cloud IAM、K8s RBAC、Secret、artifact、logs 必须一致。
  6. 再定 guardrails:allow/warn/block/exception、例外 owner、到期、审计、自动修复和用户可理解解释。
  7. 再定验证:端到端走一条 Golden Path,故意触发权限不足、配额不足、policy fail、runner fail、GitOps fail 和 rollback。
  8. 再定门禁:生产准入、环境保护、凭证轮换、模板版本、配额、成本预算、SLO、审计、回滚、迁移和弃用必须有可执行 owner。
  9. 最后定运营:adoption funnel、支持 SLO、office hour、release notes、迁移批次、弃用公告、回滚和复盘节奏。

Read the full file on GitHub · 348 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 348 lines · 112 tokens per session scan A 4ded0074888b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

platform-engineering is a skill published in the GitHub repository cass-2003/local-workflow-skill (12 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 112 tokens to every session and 8,901 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.