Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow --skill team-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/catlog22/Claude-Code-WorkflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/team-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/team-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/team-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/team-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/catlog22/claude-code-workflow/team-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.01317 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00527 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00263 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
team-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Team Review
Orchestrate multi-agent code review: scanner -> reviewer -> fixer. Toolchain + LLM scan, deep analysis with root cause enrichment, and automated fix with rollback-on-failure.
Architecture
Skill(skill="team-review", args="task description")
|
SKILL.md (this file) = Router
|
+--------------+--------------+
| |
no --role flag --role <name>
| |
Coordinator Worker
roles/coordinator/role.md roles/<name>/role.md
|
+-- analyze -> dispatch -> spawn workers -> STOP
|
+-------+-------+-------+
v v v
[scan] [review] [fix]
team-worker agents, each loads roles/<role>/role.md
Role Registry
| Role | Path | Prefix | Inner Loop |
|---|---|---|---|
| coordinator | roles/coordinator/role.md | — | — |
| scanner | roles/scanner/role.md | SCAN-* | false |
| reviewer | roles/reviewer/role.md | REV-* | false |
| fixer | roles/fixer/role.md | FIX-* | true |
Role Router
Parse $ARGUMENTS:
- Has
--role <name>-> Readroles/<name>/role.md, execute Phase 2-4 - No
--role->@roles/coordinator/role.md, execute entry router
Shared Constants
- Session prefix:
RV - Session path:
.workflow/.team/RV-<slug>-<date>/ - Team name:
review - CLI tools:
ccw cli --mode analysis(read-only),ccw cli --mode write(modifications) - Message bus:
mcp__ccw-tools__team_msg(session_id=<session-id>, ...)
Worker Spawn Template
Coordinator spawns workers using this template:
Agent({
subagent_type: "team-worker",
description: "Spawn <role> worker",
team_name: "review",
name: "<role>",
run_in_background: true,
prompt: `## Role Assignment
role: <role>
role_spec: <skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md
session: <session-folder>
session_id: <session-id>
team_name: review
requirement: <task-description>
inner_loop: <true|false>
## Progress Milestones
session_id: <session-id>
Report progress via team_msg at natural phase boundaries (context loaded -> core work done -> verification).
Report blockers immediately via team_msg type="blocker".
Report completion via team_msg type="task_complete" after final SendMessage.
Read role_spec file (@<skill_root>/roles/<role>/role.md) to load Phase 2-4 domain instructions.
Execute built-in Phase 1 (task discovery) -> role Phase 2-4 -> built-in Phase 5 (report).`
})
What ships with it
11 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- roles/coordinator/commands/analyze.md 1.9 KB
- roles/coordinator/commands/dispatch.md 2.2 KB
- roles/coordinator/commands/monitor.md 7.2 KB
- roles/coordinator/role.md 4.8 KB
- roles/fixer/role.md 3.3 KB
- roles/reviewer/role.md 3.3 KB
- roles/scanner/role.md 4.1 KB
- specs/dimensions.md 3.0 KB
- specs/finding-schema.json 2.7 KB
- specs/pipelines.md 3.0 KB
- specs/team-config.json 1.2 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 148 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A f4ee2d97d0b1
team-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository catlog22/Claude-Code-Workflow (2,124 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,317 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
simplify
This skill should be used when the user asks to "simplify", "clean up the diff", "run simplify", "simplify the changes", "review changed code for cleanup", explicitly invokes "/simplify", or asks to "commit without simplify", "skip simplify for this commit", or "commit this but skip simplify". Reviews changed code…
adversarial-squad
Deploy a bounded, profile-loaded adversarial review squad at an SDD point-cut (post-spec, post-plan, post-tasks, pre-merge, or an ad-hoc decision) so independent doctrine lenses converge on findings one reviewer would miss. Triggers: "deploy a squad", "adversarial squad", "post-tasks anti-laziness pass", "pre-spec…
resolve-pr-comments
This skill should be used when user asks to "address PR comments", "resolve PR feedback", "handle review comments", "fix PR issues", "respond to PR review", or explicitly invokes "resolve-pr-comments".
resume-session
Resume an interrupted Maestro session using the existing active-session file and shared phase tracking.
seo-audit
Run a Maestro-style SEO assessment for meta tags, structured data, crawlability, and Core Web Vitals.
execution
Phase execution methodology for orchestration workflows with error handling and completion protocols.