Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add causify-ai/helpers --skill pytest.fix_local_testsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/causify-ai/helpersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/causify-ai/helpers/pytest.fix_local_tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/causify-ai/helpers/pytest.fix_local_tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/causify-ai/helpers/pytest.fix_local_tests/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/causify-ai/helpers/pytest.fix_local_tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/causify-ai/helpers/pytest.fix_local_tests.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00800 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00320 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
pytest.fix_local_tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Goal
- Given information about failed tests
<FAILURE_INFO>run the tests, understand what is the root cause, and fix them
Workflow
Run Tests
-
The input
<FAILURE_INFO>can be:- A failing test in pytest
- E.g.,
dev_scripts_helpers/documentation/test/test_notes_to_pdf.py
- E.g.,
- A repro generated by
pytest_failed_multi_build.py- E.g.,
tmp.pytest_failed_multi_build.repro.sh
- E.g.,
- A failing test in pytest
-
Gather information about the failing tests by:
- Reading the code
- Inspecting the content of
<FAILURE_INFO> - Running the tests locally, if needed
- E.g.,
> pytest_log `<FAILURE_INFO>` > tmp.pytest_failed_multi_build.repro.sh
- E.g.,
Analyze Failures
-
Read
.claude/skills/pytest.rules.mdabout how to diagnose issues -
Collect the failing tests from the run
> i pytest_failed ... Failed tests: 25/7 dev_scripts_helpers/documentation/test/test_notes_to_pdf.py::Test_notes_to_pdf_actions::test1 dev_scripts_helpers/documentation/test/test_notes_to_pdf.py::Test_notes_to_pdf_actions::test2 dev_scripts_helpers/documentation/test/test_notes_to_pdf.py::Test_notes_to_pdf_edge_cases::test1 dev_scripts_helpers/documentation/test/test_notes_to_pdf.py::Test_notes_to_pdf_edge_cases::test2 dev_scripts_helpers/documentation/test/test_notes_to_pdf.py::Test_notes_to_pdf_edge_cases::test3 dev_scripts_helpers/documentation/test/test_notes_to_pdf.py::Test_notes_to_pdf_edge_cases::test4 dev_scripts_helpers/documentation/test/test_notes_to_pdf.py::Test_notes_to_pdf_filters::test1 dev_scripts_helpers/documentation/test/test_notes_to_pdf.py::Test_notes_to_pdf_filters::test2 dev_scripts_helpers/documentation/test/test_notes_to_pdf.py::Test_notes_to_pdf_filters::test3 dev_scripts_helpers/documentation/test/test_notes_to_pdf.py::Test_notes_to_pdf_filters::test4 dev_scripts_helpers/documentation/test/test_notes_to_pdf.py::Test_notes_to_pdf_filters::test5 ... 13:07:36 - WARN lib_tasks_pytest.py pytest_failed:1745 To run the failed tests run: tmp.pytest_failed.sh ...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 79 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 3a8e7aafeb5f
pytest.fix_local_tests is a skill published in the GitHub repository causify-ai/helpers (150 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 800 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-13.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing
Skill validation framework PLUS daily test-suite health and regression intelligence. Validates skill conformance (frontmatter, manifest coverage, resolver coverage). Runs the project test suite in tiered phases (unit / evals / integration / system health), classifies failures, and produces a regression-aware report.
verify
Verify that a change really works before you claim completion.
detect-static-dependencies
ACTIVATION PREREQUISITE: the request or discovered target must explicitly identify C#, .NET, .cs, or .csproj; otherwise stay dormant without invoking this skill. USE FOR: locating System.DateTime.Now/UtcNow, System.IO.File/Directory, System.Environment, HttpClient, Console, or Process usage in C#; auditing C# code for…
dart-downstream-fix
DART Downstream Fix: fix a DART bug reported through gz-physics or Gazebo.
testing-blocks
Use this when you have made AEM Edge Delivery Services code changes to blocks, scripts, or styles and need to validate them before opening a pull request. Covers unit testing for utilities and logic, browser testing with Playwright, linting, and guidance on what to test and how.
experiment-iterative-coder
Iterative code refinement through plan → code → evaluate → refine cycles. Runs lint checks (ruff), tests (pytest), and structured self-evaluation each cycle, then diagnoses failures and refines. Decomposes complex tasks into sequential phases, iterates up to 3 times per phase (10 total). Use when: the main agent…