代码审查

A read-only code review of the changes made during the current coding session. It checks the diff for quality, performance, security, best practices, tests, error handling, and edge cases.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing a coding session’s changed files, reporting issues by severity, and suggesting fixes with supporting evidence.
Why use it?
It helps find evidence-based problems before code is merged or delivered, without changing the files. Findings point to specific files and lines.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/cavinhuang/lume/code-review
Any agent
npx skills add CavinHuang/lume --skill code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CavinHuang/lume

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 22 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 390 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00022 $0.00390
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00195
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00078
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00039

Measured 2d ago against content hash 5ec0aedcbe1a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

代码审查 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

apps/sidecar/default-skills/code-review/SKILL.md · 27 lines

What it actually says

你是 Lume 的只读 Coding 审阅器。默认只审阅当前 Coding Turn 相对基线的 diff;不要修改、格式化、提交或回退任何文件。

先读取当前变更范围和 diff。若用户没有指定代码,使用 git diff 或当前 Coding Turn 提供的变更文件,不要泛读无关文件。

只报告有证据的问题,并严格使用以下 JSON 结构:

{"status":"complete","findings":[{"severity":"blocker|concern|suggestion|question","path":"相对工作区路径","line":1,"summary":"一句话问题","evidence":"具体证据","recommendation":"建议"}]}

没有发现问题时返回 findings: []。path 必须是变更文件,line 尽量指向 diff 中的具体行。审阅维度包括:

  1. 代码质量:可读性、命名规范、注释完整性
  2. 性能:是否有明显的性能问题或可优化点
  3. 安全:是否存在潜在安全漏洞
  4. 最佳实践:是否遵循语言/框架的最佳实践
  5. 验证完整性:是否缺少必要的测试、错误处理或边界覆盖

严重级别含义:blocker 会阻止合并或交付;concern 建议修复后再交付;suggestion 是非阻塞改进;question 表示需要用户确认的意图。修复必须由用户发起新的 Coding Turn,当前审阅不得直接应用建议。

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 27 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 5ec0aedcbe1a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

代码审查 is a skill published in the GitHub repository CavinHuang/lume (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 390 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

guizang-ppt-skill

生成横向翻页网页 PPT(单 HTML 文件),含 WebGL 背景、章节幕封、数据大字报、图片网格等模板。提供两种风格:① "电子杂志 × 电子墨水"(衬线 + 流体背景 + 暖色) ② "瑞士国际主义"(无衬线 + 网格点阵 + IKB/柠檬黄/柠檬绿/安全橙高亮)。当用户需要制作分享 / 演讲 / 发布会风格的网页 PPT,或提到"杂志风 PPT"、"瑞士风 PPT"、"Swiss Style"、"horizontal swipe deck"时使用。.

proma-ai/Proma · 161 tokens

proma-coach

Proma 使用顾问,主动把用户在 Proma/Agent/Skill/Chat 工具/项目里的摩擦、疑惑、重复解释和低效流程,转成更顺手的使用方式或合适的知识维护动作。触发要积极:用户表达不满、困惑、重复提醒、"为什么没用/不会自动/又要我说"、"算了,我自己来"、"你上次不是说..."、"你又忘了"、"以后都这样/能不能记住/少让我选/下次自动"、询问 Proma 怎么用更好、某事能不能固化、该用 Agent 还是 Chat 工具、有没有现成 Skill、Skill 为什么没触发、想优化已有 Skill description、想减少步骤/降低认知负担/让 Proma…

proma-ai/Proma · 386 tokens

skill-creator

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

proma-ai/Proma · 64 tokens

automation

Proma 内嵌自动任务与定时任务 Skill,属于 Proma 自带能力而不是用户临时安装的外部 Skill。触发要非常宽泛、非常冗余:只要用户的话里出现任何“未来还要做”“以后继续看”“重复做”“再跑一次也有价值”“定期/周期/每天/每周/每月/每隔一段时间”“持续关注/持续观察/长期跟进/长期监控”“自动检查/自动汇总/自动生成/自动复盘/自动维护”“无人值守”“有变化告诉我”“异常时提醒我”“结果不好就调整”“查看运行记录”“优化已有任务”“暂停/恢复/删除/立即运行任务”等迹象,就应该触发此 Skill,先判断是否适合 Proma 定时任务。也要覆盖一次性与有限次的延时执行信号:“X…

proma-ai/Proma · 390 tokens

docx

Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when…

proma-ai/Proma · 168 tokens

agent-collaboration

Proma 协作子 Agent Skill。当需要并行探索多个方向(多样性探索)、对抗性审查验证已有方案、或多个长耗时独立任务需要真实可见的子会话时触发。用于判断是否以及如何调用 Proma 内置 collaboration 工具创建协作子会话。简单搜索、短调研、单文件修改、一次性代码审查由父会话直接使用普通工具完成。.

proma-ai/Proma · 101 tokens