Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/cdavid817/vanehub-ai/code-reviewnpx skills add cdavid817/vanehub-ai --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cdavid817/vanehub-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cdavid817/vanehub-ai/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cdavid817/vanehub-ai/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cdavid817/vanehub-ai/code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00129 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00064 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00026 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
代码审查助手 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
代码审查助手
Use this skill for code review. Prioritize correctness, regressions, missing tests, data loss, security issues, and maintainability. Lead with concrete findings tied to files and behavior.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 20 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A ea13e094a415
代码审查助手 is a skill published in the GitHub repository cdavid817/vanehub-ai (110 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 129 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
html-ppt-zhangzara-monochrome
A grant proposal on CRISPR base-editing for sickle-cell disease — the hypothesis, the approach, the milestones, and the risk. Built as a decision-grade academic research deck for grant review committee.
reflect
Skill "reflect" from PM-Shawn/Abu-Cowork, covering 复盘助手, 复盘框架, 1. 任务回顾, 2. 经验教训 and 3. 可沉淀的模式.
critical-review
Radical-honesty architectural review — questions code, methodology, design, and operational fitness.
dev-loop
Research → Execute → Dual-Review Loop (Code Quality + Issue Resolution) bis beide Reviews bestanden.
review-loop
Iterative code review — fix P1+P2 until clean, report P3 as an offer.
simplify
Review recent code changes for reuse, quality, and efficiency. Use when the user asks for a code-quality pass, requests "/simplify", or asks to audit recent changes for duplication or technical debt.