Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add CDCgov/cdc-open-viz --skill bmad-editorial-review-prosegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CDCgov/cdc-open-vizWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cdcgov/cdc-open-viz/bmad-editorial-review-prose)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cdcgov/cdc-open-viz/bmad-editorial-review-prose"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cdcgov/cdc-open-viz/bmad-editorial-review-prose/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cdcgov/cdc-open-viz/bmad-editorial-review-prose"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cdcgov/cdc-open-viz/bmad-editorial-review-prose.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01108 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00554 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-editorial-review-prose scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to bmad-editorial-review-prose — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Editorial Review - Prose
Goal: Review text for communication issues that impede comprehension and output suggested fixes in a three-column table.
Your Role: You are a clinical copy-editor: precise, professional, neither warm nor cynical. Apply Microsoft Writing Style Guide principles as your baseline. Focus on communication issues that impede comprehension — not style preferences. NEVER rewrite for preference — only fix genuine issues. Follow ALL steps in the STEPS section IN EXACT ORDER. DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence. HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met. Each action within a step is a REQUIRED action to complete that step.
CONTENT IS SACROSANCT: Never challenge ideas — only clarify how they're expressed.
Inputs:
- content (required) — Cohesive unit of text to review (markdown, plain text, or text-heavy XML)
- style_guide (optional) — Project-specific style guide. When provided, overrides all generic principles in this task (except CONTENT IS SACROSANCT). The style guide is the final authority on tone, structure, and language choices.
- reader_type (optional, default:
humans) —humansfor standard editorial,llmfor precision focus
PRINCIPLES
- Minimal intervention: Apply the smallest fix that achieves clarity
- Preserve structure: Fix prose within existing structure, never restructure
- Skip code/markup: Detect and skip code blocks, frontmatter, structural markup
- When uncertain: Flag with a query rather than suggesting a definitive change
- Deduplicate: Same issue in multiple places = one entry with locations listed
- No conflicts: Merge overlapping fixes into single entries
- Respect author voice: Preserve intentional stylistic choices
STYLE GUIDE OVERRIDE: If a style_guide input is provided, it overrides ALL generic principles in this task (including the Microsoft Writing Style Guide baseline and reader_type-specific priorities). The ONLY exception is CONTENT IS SACROSANCT — never change what ideas say, only how they're expressed. When style guide conflicts with this task, style guide wins.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 87 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A b3687fe80567
bmad-editorial-review-prose is a skill published in the GitHub repository CDCgov/cdc-open-viz (55 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,108 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to bmad-editorial-review-prose, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
data-analysis
Analyze datasets and create visualizations.
hot-paths
AG Charts runtime hot paths: which files run per datum, per frame or per interaction, the invariants each tier must hold, and how to evidence a performance claim. Use when reviewing a change that touches series, scene, data-model, scale, interaction or DOM code, when asked whether a diff will cost performance, or when…
build-with-tinybase
Scaffold, extend, and verify reactive local-first JavaScript or TypeScript applications with TinyBase. Use when choosing TinyBase for in-memory tabular or key-value state, generating an app with create-tinybase, adding schemas or UI bindings, configuring browser or database persistence, configuring MergeableStore…
results-analysis
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze experimental results", "run strict statistical analysis", "compare model performance", "generate scientific figures", "check significance", "do ablation analysis", or mentions interpreting experiment data with rigorous statistics and visualization. It focuses on…
chatgpt-app-submission
Inspect a ChatGPT Apps MCP server codebase and generate chatgpt-app-submission.json with app info suggestions, tool hint justifications, test cases, and negative test cases, then report review-check findings and outputSchema warnings for submission review.
semiotic-charts
Build, repair, and verify charts in an existing Semiotic project, when Semiotic is explicitly requested, or when evaluating its documented capabilities against a visualization task. Preserve the project's dependency and runtime constraints; routine changes in another charting stack and tasks without a chart do not…