Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Cecilapp/Cecil --skill address-pr-commentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Cecilapp/CecilWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cecilapp/cecil/address-pr-comments)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cecilapp/cecil/address-pr-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cecilapp/cecil/address-pr-comments/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cecilapp/cecil/address-pr-comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cecilapp/cecil/address-pr-comments.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00505 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00202 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
address-pr-comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed EUPL-1.2
The repository is licensed EUPL-1.2, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 61 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 48ee3f471c76
address-pr-comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository Cecilapp/Cecil (299 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed EUPL-1.2. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 505 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-23.
Other skills, from other repositories
claim-ledger
Before opening a PR, enumerate every behavior it claims — stated, callers- unaffected, invariants-preserved — and tag each with the strongest evidence actually held: RAN, READ, or ASSUMED with a closed-set reason. Ship the ASSUMED residue in the PR description; log harness blockers durably. After review, reconcile…
PR Review
Manage pull request workflow.
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
review-delta
Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.
github-contributor
A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.