Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio --skill test-evidence-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/test-evidence-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/test-evidence-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/test-evidence-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/test-evidence-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/test-evidence-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01662 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00831 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00332 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
test-evidence-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 208 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Evidence Review
A test file existing is not the same as a test file being good. This skill audits each in-scope story's test evidence against a fixed quality bar and emits per-story verdicts.
Purpose / When to Run
Run when:
- Before a
/team-qasign-off pass - After
/dev-storylands several stories and a sweep is needed - When a sprint is in
In Reviewand QA wants assurance the test evidence holds up - On demand for a single story whose evidence is in dispute
Distinct from /smoke-check (runs the suite) and /regression-suite
(maps coverage to critical paths) — this skill judges quality of the
evidence already produced.
Inputs
- Story files under
production/sprints/orproduction/epics/ - Test files under
tests/unit/,tests/integration/,tests/e2e/ - Manual evidence docs under
production/qa/evidence/ - Smoke reports under
production/qa/smoke-*.md
Outputs
- A printed report keyed by story. Read-only — this skill writes nothing.
Phase 1: Scope Resolution
Parse the argument:
sprint-NN— read all stories inproduction/sprints/sprint-NN/(or the sprint folder underproduction/epics/).- A story path — review just that story.
--all— review every story whose Status isIn RevieworComplete.
Read each in-scope story file and capture:
- Story Type
- Acceptance Criteria
- Test Evidence path
Phase 2: For Each Story, Run These Checks
Logic stories — automated unit test required
Read the test file. Score:
- File exists at the declared path.
- File name matches
[module]_[feature]_test.[ext]. - Each AC has at least one named test function whose name implies the AC.
- Boundary values from the PRD's Formulas / Limits section are covered.
- Tests are deterministic — no
Math.random()/Random()/DateTime.now()without injection. - No real network, file I/O, or database — mocks are used.
- Each test asserts at least one observable outcome — no empty
it()ortest()blocks. - Test count is reasonable (>= AC count; flag if 3x AC count, may be over-tested).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 208 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 4b88c8f5e403
test-evidence-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio (40 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,662 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
QA Sentinel Agent
Quality-assurance knowledge for test STRATEGY, coverage analysis, bug detection, and quality gates — the reference the qa-sentinel agent reasons from. Use when designing a test plan, deciding unit vs integration vs E2E, judging whether coverage is real or hollow, setting quality-gate thresholds, or reviewing a PR for…
test-audit
Batch audit of test files against Q1-Q25 quality gates and AP1-AP32 anti-patterns. Detects orphan tests, phantom mocks, untested public methods. Tiered output (A/B/C/D) with critical gate enforcement and optional post-audit fix workflow. Flags: zuvo:test-audit all | [path] | [file] | --deep | --quick | --include-e2e |…
testing-guide
A testing guide covering the test pyramid and standards for unit, integration, system, and end-to-end tests.
Quality Assurance
Comprehensive quality assurance combining testing strategy, code quality enforcement, and validation gates. Consolidated from testing-strategist, code-quality-enforcer, and validation-gate-checker.
multi-agent-verify
Multi-agent parallel verification. Spawns 3 independent agents (OpenCode CLI, Codex CLI, Claude Task subagent) in separate git worktrees to review, test, and fix code. Synthesizes results and applies final fixes on the original branch.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.