Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add leyuan0602-glitch/cc-claude-codex --skill multi-agent-verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/leyuan0602-glitch/cc-claude-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leyuan0602-glitch/cc-claude-codex/multi-agent-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leyuan0602-glitch/cc-claude-codex/multi-agent-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leyuan0602-glitch/cc-claude-codex/multi-agent-verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leyuan0602-glitch/cc-claude-codex/multi-agent-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leyuan0602-glitch/cc-claude-codex/multi-agent-verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.02177 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01089 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00435 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00218 |
Grade A, and why
multi-agent-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 212 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Multi-Agent Verify: Parallel Verification with 3 Independent Agents
You are the Main Agent (Claude Code). You orchestrate 3 independent agents to verify code in parallel. Each agent works in its own git worktree, reviews code, writes tests, runs verification, and fixes bugs independently. You then synthesize their findings and apply a final fix.
Agent Launch Methods
Each agent uses a DIFFERENT launch mechanism:
| Agent | Method | Why |
|---|---|---|
| OpenCode | Bash CLI: opencode run -m opencode/minimax-m2.5-free "..." |
External CLI, free model, no nesting issues |
| Codex | Bash CLI: codex exec --full-auto "..." |
External CLI, no nesting issues |
| Claude | Task tool with isolation: "worktree" |
MUST use Task tool — claude CLI CANNOT run nested inside Claude Code (detects CLAUDECODE env var and refuses) |
CRITICAL: Never launch claude via Bash CLI from within Claude Code. Always use the Task tool with isolation: "worktree" and run_in_background: true.
Prerequisites
Before invoking:
- All code changes are committed on the current branch
- Requirements are available (from
status.mdor conversation context) opencodeandcodexare in PATH (check withwhich)- No external orchestrator script is required — launch agents directly
Phase V1: Preparation
Mode A: cc-claude-codex Integration
When called as cc-claude-codex Phase 3:
- Read
.cc-claude-codex/status.md— extract ALL requirements and scenarios - Run
git diff main...HEAD --name-statusto get the full list of changed files- If
maindoesn't exist, trymasteror use the appropriate base branch
- If
- Build the verification prompt (see Prompt Template below)
- Write the filled prompt to
.cc-claude-codex/verify-prompt-{ts}.md
Mode B: Standalone
When invoked directly:
- Get requirements from conversation context, or ask the user
- Identify changed files via
git diff {base}...HEAD --name-status- Try
main,master, or ask user for the base branch
- Try
- Build the verification prompt (see Prompt Template below)
- Write the filled prompt to
.claude/verify-prompt-{ts}.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 212 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 5c7932a4b5ce
multi-agent-verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository leyuan0602-glitch/cc-claude-codex (9 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 2,177 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-audit
Batch audit of test files against Q1-Q25 quality gates and AP1-AP32 anti-patterns. Detects orphan tests, phantom mocks, untested public methods. Tiered output (A/B/C/D) with critical gate enforcement and optional post-audit fix workflow. Flags: zuvo:test-audit all | [path] | [file] | --deep | --quick | --include-e2e |…
QA Sentinel Agent
Quality-assurance knowledge for test STRATEGY, coverage analysis, bug detection, and quality gates — the reference the qa-sentinel agent reasons from. Use when designing a test plan, deciding unit vs integration vs E2E, judging whether coverage is real or hollow, setting quality-gate thresholds, or reviewing a PR for…
test-evidence-review
Quality review of test files and manual evidence docs. Goes beyond existence checks — evaluates assertion coverage, edge cases, naming conventions, and evidence completeness. Verdict: ADEQUATE / INCOMPLETE / MISSING per story. Run before QA sign-off or on demand.
testing-guide
A testing guide covering the test pyramid and standards for unit, integration, system, and end-to-end tests.
Quality Assurance
Comprehensive quality assurance combining testing strategy, code quality enforcement, and validation gates. Consolidated from testing-strategist, code-quality-enforcer, and validation-gate-checker.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.