Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio --skill test-helpersgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/test-helpers)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/test-helpers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/test-helpers/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/test-helpers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio/test-helpers.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.01351 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00675 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00270 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
test-helpers scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Helpers
Reads existing tests, finds repeated setup, and extracts that into a helper library so future tests stay short and intention-revealing.
Phase 1: Read Project Context
Read in parallel:
.claude/docs/technical-preferences.md— Framework, Testing Framework, Naming Conventions..claude/docs/coding-standards.md— test rules.tests/helpers/(if present) — what already exists.
Confirm the framework. If unset, redirect to /setup-framework.
Phase 2: Scan Existing Tests
Glob the test tree:
- RN/TS:
tests/**/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} - Flutter:
tests/**/*_test.dartandtest/**/*_test.dart - iOS:
tests/**/*Tests.swift - Android:
tests/**/*Test.kt
For each file, find:
- Repeated factory functions (e.g., builders that return a
User,Product,CartItem, etc.). - Repeated mocks (network client, storage, analytics, deep-link router, push handler).
- Repeated assertion patterns (e.g., "the screen shows error X" or "the store dispatched action Y").
- Repeated setup/teardown blocks (auth state, seed data, navigation stack).
Group results by recurrence count. Anything that appears 3+ times is a candidate.
Phase 3: Propose the Helper API
Produce a proposal table:
| Helper | Type | Used in | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
makeUser({...overrides}) |
Factory | 8 tests | duplicated user objects |
mockApiClient(responses) |
Mock | 5 tests | repeated fetch stubs |
expectScreenShowsError(matcher) |
Matcher | 4 tests | repeated assertion |
Use AskUserQuestion to confirm:
[A] Generate every helper in the table[B] Generate only the top N[C] Let me pick — show one at a time
Phase 4: Write the Helpers
Create files under tests/helpers/ grouped by purpose. Always ask before
each write. Naming follows the framework convention.
Factories — tests/helpers/factories/*
Pattern: pure functions that take an overrides object and return a
fully-formed domain object with sensible defaults.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 189 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A d825790a5604
test-helpers is a skill published in the GitHub repository cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio (40 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 1,351 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
migrate-xunit-to-xunit-v3
Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
nw-fp-clojure
Clojure language-specific patterns, data-first modeling, REPL-driven development, and spec.
mobiai-ios-testing
Use when writing or running tests in an iOS project — unit tests, UI tests, snapshot tests, choosing the right framework.
restore-internals-seams-in-finally-blocks-after-each-test
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
testing-llm
LLM and AI testing patterns — mock responses, evaluation with DeepEval/RAGAS, structured output validation, and agentic test patterns (generator, healer, planner). Use when testing AI features, validating LLM outputs, or building evaluation pipelines.