Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add chan4lk/specclaw --skill bf-rebuild-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chan4lk/specclawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chan4lk/specclaw/bf-rebuild-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chan4lk/specclaw/bf-rebuild-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chan4lk/specclaw/bf-rebuild-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chan4lk/specclaw/bf-rebuild-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chan4lk/specclaw/bf-rebuild-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Anti-Refusal · line 53 Skill instructs the agent to omit warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Stripping safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.Fix: Remove instructions that suppress warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Let the agent surface safety-relevant caveats to the user.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00456 | $0.06253 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00228 | $0.03127 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00091 | $0.01251 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00046 | $0.00625 |
Grade A, and why
bf-rebuild-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
specclaw bf-rebuild-plan
First, run specclaw-ensure-init .specclaw — idempotently creates .specclaw/ if it doesn't exist (silent if already initialized; auto-inits using the current directory's basename as the project name).
Turn the four analysis documents — plus, when present, decisions.md, clarifications.md, and the baseline outputs (manifest.json/scenarios.md) — into a living, ID-stable rebuild backlog. Read-only side-command — no specclaw-validate-change call, no <change> involved, matching the analyze/architecture/domain/clarify/baseline pattern.
Determine the invocation mode from the user's message: refresh mode if it contains --refresh, default mode otherwise. Additionally, if the message contains --module MOD-###, this is a module-scoped run: pass that flag through to both collect and render, unchanged.
Step 1 — Collect
specclaw-bf-rebuild-collect collect .specclaw [--refresh] [--module MOD-###]
Pass --refresh only in refresh mode, and --module MOD-### only if the user named a module. This single step:
- Checks that all five
.specclaw/analysis/*.mddocuments exist — the four analysis documents plusmodule-map.md, which declares theMOD-###modules every backlog item is grouped under. If it exits non-zero for this reason, surface its stderr message to the user verbatim and stop — it names exactly which document(s) are missing and which command produces each (module-map.mdcomes from/specclaw:bf-domain). Don't retry, don't attempt a partial backlog from partial input, and never invent a grouping to work around a missing map. - Fails if
--modulenames no active module in the map, listing the ones that do exist. A withdrawn module cannot be planned — its id stays claimed as a tombstone. - If
.specclaw/analysis/rebuild-backlog.mdalready exists and--refreshwas not passed, it exits non-zero with a refusal message — surface that message verbatim and stop. Do not delete or archive the file yourself; tell the user to re-run with--refresh, or to archive/delete it manually first if they genuinely want a from-scratch run. - Otherwise emits one JSON object to stdout: the module roster from
module-map.md(each module's id, name, active/withdrawn status,DR-###rules, and dependencies) together with the map's ownPROPOSED/CONFIRMEDstatus and this run'smodule_scope; the five documents' paths/line counts; which optional inputs are present (decisions.md,clarifications.md,.specclaw/baseline/manifest.json,.specclaw/baseline/scenarios.md) with their resolved paths; everyclarifications.mdquestion'sid/type/blocking/answered/rules/items(ID-level facts only, no prose); whichCQ-###ids have a recorded decision; thescenarios.mdroster andmanifest.jsonfixtures (id/rules/item); whether a "No Legacy Behaviour Exists" section is present; and — in refresh mode — every existingBL-###item'sid/title/depends_on/rules/status/prior Gate/Verification. It also reports the next freeBL-###id.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 150 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3b78748d4558
bf-rebuild-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository chan4lk/specclaw (12 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 456 tokens to every session and 6,253 once invoked, about $0.0023 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
raise-issue
A good bug report is not a good description. It is a description a developer can act on before they have found the code themselves. That translation is the whole job here.
report-issue
This is an alias so that both /raise-issue and /report-issue work.
capture-lessons
Ship and capture lessons workflow. Creates the PR, updates lessons learned, updates documentation, generates the sprint retrospective, and updates the backlog. Use at the end of a sprint cycle, or when the user says "ship", "capture", "lessons", "retro", "retrospective", "wrap up", or "done with this sprint". Also use…
sprint-plan
Sprint planning workflow. Creates a structured plan from the backlog with tasks, acceptance criteria, dependencies, and risks. Use when starting a new sprint, planning work, or when the user says "plan", "sprint", "what should we work on", or "next sprint". Always use this skill to start a sprint cycle — never plan…
update-briefs
Updates the briefs/ shared memory directory after a sprint completes. Reads sprint outputs and writes structured summaries for other agents. Use after any sprint completes, or when the user says "update briefs", "sync state", "update project state", or "what changed". Also use automatically after /capture-lessons or…
project-launch-checklist
Audits a project for hiring visibility before going public. Verifies README clarity for impatient hiring managers, checks evaluation setup, tests, CI/CD, config file, and deployment link. Generates a pre-launch audit report with gaps and priorities. Use when you're ready to make a project visible to hiring managers or…