Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev --skill ado-work-itemsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev/ado-work-items)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev/ado-work-items"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev/ado-work-items/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev/ado-work-items"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev/ado-work-items.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Prompt Injection · line 43 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.03456 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.01382 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00691 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00346 |
Grade A, and why
ado-work-items scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 446 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Azure DevOps Work Items Skill
This skill provides guidance on creating and managing Azure DevOps work items when using the Azure DevOps MCP server tools. It ensures work items follow organizational best practices for hierarchy, formatting, naming conventions, and hour estimation.
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- Creating Features, User Stories, or Tasks in Azure DevOps
- Planning work item hierarchies for a feature or epic
- Structuring acceptance criteria or task descriptions
- Applying naming conventions to work items
- Estimating hours or story points for work items
- Using the
@azure-devops/mcpMCP server tools
Work Item Hierarchy
Azure DevOps uses a three-level structure for Agile projects:
- Features (top level) - High-level capabilities or business objectives
- User Stories (child of Features) - Specific functionality from a user perspective
- Tasks (child of User Stories) - Individual work items for implementation
Key Rules:
- Every User Story must belong to a Feature (parent-child relationship)
- Every Task must belong to a User Story (parent-child relationship)
- Features contain one or more User Stories
- User Stories contain one or more Tasks
HTML Formatting Requirement
CRITICAL: All text fields (Description, Acceptance Criteria) must use proper HTML formatting for correct rendering in Azure DevOps.
Examples:
<!-- Good: Proper HTML -->
<p>As a developer, I need to implement user authentication.</p>
<p><strong>Background:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Current system has no authentication</li>
<li>Users need secure login</li>
</ul>
<!-- Bad: Plain text -->
As a developer, I need to implement user authentication.
Background:
- Current system has no authentication
- Users need secure login
HTML Formatting Guidelines:
- Use
<p>tags for paragraphs - Use
<ul>and<li>for bullet lists - Use
<ol>and<li>for numbered lists - Use
<strong>for bold text - Use
<em>for italic text - Use
<h3>,<h4>for section headers (if needed)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 446 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A e14edd8ecae6
ado-work-items is a skill published in the GitHub repository charlesjones-dev/claude-code-plugins-dev (35 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 3,456 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
shiplog
Recap of everything shipped since the last run - cross-repo PRs, security fixes, star deltas, and X traction, synthesized into a digest article and a ready-to-post shiplog in your voice.
connect
Choose which wiki this session uses, the team project's pages on the Nimbalyst server or the project's local wiki of files, and connect a repository to its team project. Use at the start of a task before any wiki tool, when a wiki tool returns reponotbound, ambiguousproject, pinmismatch, projectnotaccessible…
llxprt-issue-workflow
Use this skill when asked to address, fix, or work on a GitHub issue in the llxprt-code repository. Covers the complete issue lifecycle - branch setup, gh CLI usage, test-first planning, subagent delegation and review loops, the full verification cycle (including the zai-glm-flash smoke test), open code review (ocr)…
cuga-github-issues
Create GitHub issues for cuga-agent (bugs, features, epics, designs, and related work) against origin using gh, with epic → feature → issue hierarchy and GraphQL sub-issue linking. Use when the user says create new issues, report a bug, file a bug, feature request, new feature, create an epic, GitHub issue, sub-issue…
implement-issue
Implement a Linear brief in a named GitHub repo. Use when the brief skill is implement-issue or the user wants a new branch and draft PR.