Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill algo-mfg-doegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-mfg-doe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-mfg-doe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-mfg-doe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-mfg-doe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/algo-mfg-doe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.01084 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00542 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00217 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
"algo-mfg-doe" scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to algo-mfg-doe — 8 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Design of Experiments (DOE)
Overview
DOE systematically varies process factors to identify their effects on responses. Full factorial tests all combinations; fractional factorial tests a strategic subset. Identifies main effects and interactions. More efficient than one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) which misses interactions. Uses ANOVA for analysis.
When to Use
Trigger conditions:
- Identifying which process factors significantly affect quality/yield
- Optimizing process settings for target performance
- Screening many factors to find the vital few
When NOT to use:
- When the process is not stable (stabilize with SPC first)
- For observational data with no ability to manipulate factors
Algorithm
IRON LAW: One-Factor-At-A-Time (OFAT) MISSES Interactions
Changing one factor while holding others fixed cannot detect
interactions (where the effect of A depends on the level of B).
Full factorial or fractional factorial designs test ALL main effects
AND interactions in fewer runs than OFAT. A 2³ factorial (8 runs)
gives more information than 6 OFAT runs at lower cost.
Phase 1: Input Validation
Define: response variable(s), factors (2-7 practical), levels per factor (usually 2 for screening, 3 for optimization), constraints, noise factors. Gate: Factors and levels defined, practical to run all experimental conditions.
Phase 2: Core Algorithm
Screening (many factors): 2^(k-p) fractional factorial. Choose resolution III+ (main effects not confounded with each other).
Optimization (few factors): 2^k full factorial or central composite design (CCD) for response surface.
- Generate design matrix (run order, factor level assignments)
- Randomize run order (critical for validity)
- Execute experiments, record responses
- Analyze: ANOVA for factor significance, effect plots, interaction plots
- If optimizing: fit response surface model, find optimal settings
Phase 3: Verification
Check: R² of model is adequate, residuals are normally distributed and random. Confirmation runs at predicted optimal settings match prediction. Gate: Model is significant, residuals OK, confirmation runs pass.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 93 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A 1d81e55215de
"algo-mfg-doe" is a skill published in the GitHub repository charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill (25 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 1,084 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to algo-mfg-doe, differing in 8 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
co2-carbon-footprint
Calculate CO2 emissions and carbon footprint from BIM model data. Analyze embodied carbon by material, element, and building system.
cwicr-unit-converter
Convert between construction measurement units. Handle metric/imperial conversion, area/volume calculations, and unit normalization for CWICR data.
co2-estimation
Calculate carbon footprint of construction projects. Estimate CO2 emissions from materials, transportation, and construction processes using emission factors databases.
energy-simulation
Building energy simulation and analysis for construction. Calculate heating/cooling loads, evaluate envelope performance, optimize HVAC sizing, and ensure energy code compliance.
cwicr-waste-calculator
Calculate material waste factors and losses using CWICR norms. Apply waste percentages, cutting losses, and spillage factors to material quantities.
carbon-calculator
Calculate embodied carbon in construction materials. Track CO2 emissions, compare alternatives, and generate sustainability reports.