Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Chemaclass/agnostic-ai --skill run-sync-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Chemaclass/agnostic-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/run-sync-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/run-sync-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/run-sync-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/run-sync-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chemaclass/agnostic-ai/run-sync-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00252 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00126 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00050 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
run-sync-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
run-sync-check
Verifies that emitted target files match what the current specs would produce.
Steps
- Build the binary if changed:
make build. - Run
./agnostic-ai sync --check. Exit 0 means the working tree matches the bundle. - If exit is non-zero, the tool prints a unified diff per drifting file.
- Decide:
- Source edited, emitted file lags -> run
agnostic-ai syncto refresh. - Adapter edited, emitted files would change -> intentional. Run
agnostic-ai syncand review the diff ingit diff. - Neither edited but check still drifts -> capture mode skipped reading existing files. Re-run with
agnostic-ai syncand inspect.
- Source edited, emitted file lags -> run
- Never edit emitted files by hand to silence the check. The next sync rewrites them.
CI
sync --check is the gate. A drift exits 1 and fails the workflow. The fix is always to re-sync locally and commit, never to edit the emitted file.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 24 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 45f1f773801d
run-sync-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository Chemaclass/agnostic-ai (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 252 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
eg-fix-bug
Fix a bug with Codex using problem doc, independent diagnosis, failing test, fix, review, and validation.
code_explorer
Explores the repository to locate primary source files, coupled UI components, and test files for bug reports or feature requests.
rubber-duck
Adversarial "rubber duck" review that turns explaining-out-loud into a hallucination check. The main session is the PRESENTER (it did the work — a design doc, investigation, or analysis — and holds the real reasoning) and reconstructs the topic to a LISTENER — a spawned subagent pinned to a DIFFERENT-vendor model that…
ios-simulator
Verify and debug native, React Native, Expo, or Flutter apps on an iOS Simulator with agent-device. Use when an agent needs to launch an app, inspect its live UI, tap, type, scroll, validate a code change, collect failure evidence, or reproduce a workflow on an iPhone or iPad Simulator.
cvm-ai-doctor
A health-diagnosis workflow for servers, computers, virtual machines, and containers on Linux, macOS, or Windows.
therapeutic-ifs
Unified inner work engine: Schema deconstruction (diagnosis) + IFS therapy (treatment). Absorbs: schema-deconstruction.