Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add chemrich/cabineteer --skill run-evalsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chemrich/cabineteerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chemrich/cabineteer/run-evals)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chemrich/cabineteer/run-evals"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chemrich/cabineteer/run-evals/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chemrich/cabineteer/run-evals"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chemrich/cabineteer/run-evals.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.00666 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00333 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00133 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
run-evals scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Running the eval suite
The evals are the fast, transport-free integration check for this repo. They import server handler functions directly via TOOL_DISPATCH, so the whole suite runs in about one second. Run them after any non-trivial change — CLAUDE.md treats this as required.
Commands
uv run python -m evals # full suite
uv run python -m evals --tag kitchen # one tag
uv run python -m evals --tag drawer --tag door # OR across tags (repeatable)
uv run python -m evals --difficulty basic # basic | standard | advanced
uv run python -m evals --name overflow_drawer_stack # one scenario (repeatable)
uv run python -m evals --json # machine-readable (CI/scripting)
uv run python -m evals --verbose # show passing assertions too
uv run python -m evals --list # print the catalogue without running
--tag is validated against the auto-derived ALL_TAGS; a typo exits with code 2, and a filter combination that matches zero scenarios exits 1 (both were vacuous-green holes before PR #21 — do not "fix" them back).
Baseline
Green is 305 scenarios / 1139 assertions / 100%. Exit code 0 on all-pass, 1 on any failure. If your change moves the assertion count, that's expected only when you added/removed assertions — otherwise investigate.
Reading a failure
Each failing scenario prints [FAIL] <name> (passed/total) followed by the failing assertion's path and operator. The path is a dot-walk into the tool's JSON result (e.g. summary.errors, exterior.width_mm). To reproduce a single failure in isolation:
uv run python -m evals --name <scenario_name> --verbose
To inspect the actual tool output the assertion walked, drive the handler directly (see the drive-mcp-handlers skill) with the same args from evals/scenarios.py.
Where things live
- Harness + assertion operators:
evals/harness.py(evaluate_assertion,run_all,TOOL_DISPATCH). - Scenarios (declarative data):
evals/scenarios.py. - CLI/flags:
evals/__main__.py.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 48 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A d2a29ac1fd65
run-evals is a skill published in the GitHub repository chemrich/cabineteer (3 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 666 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.