Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add CHENyiru3/AI-Skills-Collections --skill scientific-brainstorminggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CHENyiru3/AI-Skills-CollectionsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chenyiru3/ai-skills-collections/scientific-brainstorming)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chenyiru3/ai-skills-collections/scientific-brainstorming"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chenyiru3/ai-skills-collections/scientific-brainstorming/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chenyiru3/ai-skills-collections/scientific-brainstorming"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chenyiru3/ai-skills-collections/scientific-brainstorming.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00960 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00384 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00192 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
scientific-brainstorming scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scientific Brainstorming
Produce candidate directions, their assumptions, and discriminating next checks. Brainstorming supplies proposals, not validation or approval to execute them. Keep ideas, assumptions, predictions, located evidence, and actual decisions distinct. Preserve human ideas, negative evidence, and unresolved disagreement.
Scope and generate
Infer the focal question, constraints, and decision from the request and relevant project records. Ask only for missing information that changes the task. An ordinary chat brainstorm can be completed in the response without a workshop, JSON register, scoring system, or new project-management documents.
- Direct AI-assisted session: generate candidates and then critique them. Disclose actual information exposure and missing expertise. Multiple model roles or samples are perspectives, not independent experts or replications.
- Real human session: private initial generation, leader-last sharing, and independent ratings can reduce particular participation/anchoring problems. Do not invent participants, dissent, reviews, or approvals. This skill does not itself authorize contacting people or spawning agents.
Vary mechanisms and assumptions, not just wording. Include a plausible null, measurement explanation, or simpler alternative when relevant. Record what each retained idea predicts and what would make it wrong or uninformative. Analogies need explicit mappings and mismatches; they are proposals rather than evidence.
Challenge and compare
State relevant criteria and tradeoffs. Qualitative comparison is usually enough. For requested numeric scoring, expose scale anchors, directions, weights, raw ratings, uncertainty, and sensitivity. Scores support a decision; they do not establish truth, erase disagreement, or automatically select a winner.
Challenge shortlisted ideas with competing explanations, confounding, measurement failure, feasibility, and concrete harms. Identify an actual independent reviewer when one participated; otherwise label the self-critique.
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 228 B
- LICENSE.md 1.0 KB
- references/brainstorming_methods.md 13 KB
- references/facilitation_workflows.md 12 KB
- references/idea_evaluation.md 12 KB
- references/local_workflow.md 2.3 KB
- references/responsible_ai.md 11 KB
- references/sources.md 18 KB
- scripts/_common.py 9.7 KB runs code
- scripts/evaluate_matrix.py 20 KB runs code
- scripts/session_scaffold.py 7.7 KB runs code
- scripts/validate_register.py 20 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 92 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 5922ed5b2a99
scientific-brainstorming is a skill published in the GitHub repository CHENyiru3/AI-Skills-Collections (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 960 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-13.
scientific-brainstorming compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scientific-brainstormingCHENyiru3/AI-Skills-Collections | Skill | 2 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code, Codex |
| instrument-data-to-allotropeanthropics/knowledge-work-plugins | Skill | 36k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 123 | Claude Code |
| matlabK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 57k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| exploratory-data-analysisK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 57k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 83 | Claude Code |
| phylogeneticsK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 57k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 71 | Claude Code, Codex |
| research-engineerdavila7/claude-code-templates | Skill | 34k | today | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code, Codex |
| mapping-to-snomedmaziyarpanahi/openmed | Skill | 5.8k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 205 | Claude Code |