Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chf3198/copilot-governancenpx agentmods add skills/chf3198/copilot-governance/cross-family-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chf3198/copilot-governance/cross-family-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chf3198/copilot-governance/cross-family-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chf3198/copilot-governance/cross-family-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chf3198/copilot-governance/cross-family-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chf3198/copilot-governance/cross-family-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00893 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00447 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00179 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00089 |
Grade A, and why
cross-family-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
# Direct curl (fallback when dispatcher unavailable) How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cross-Family Review Skill
Purpose
Dispatches to a non-Anthropic fleet model (Qwen via Ollama) and returns a structured verdict. Implements the cross-family independence contract: the reviewing model's AI family MUST differ from the implementing role's family.
Lifecycle Points
| Point | Who | When | Required? |
|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | Manager | Pre-implementation orientation | Advisory |
| L2 | Collaborator | Pre-COLLABORATOR_HANDOFF | REQUIRED |
| L3 | Admin | Receipt of COLLABORATOR_HANDOFF | REQUIRED |
| L4 | Consultant | Pre-CONSULTANT_CLOSEOUT | REQUIRED |
| L5 | Manager | Tier-2 anneal on repeated same-family | Advisory |
Use L2 before every COLLABORATOR_HANDOFF. L3 and L4 are CI-gated.
Invocation
# L2 — standard (7B fast, ~30-60s)
node scripts/global/fleet-red-team-dispatch.js \
--artifact-type collaborator-handoff \
--ticket <N> \
--model qwen2.5-coder:7b
# L2 — high-stakes (32B, ~3-5 min)
node scripts/global/fleet-red-team-dispatch.js \
--artifact-type collaborator-handoff \
--ticket <N> \
--model qwen2.5-coder:32b
# Direct curl (fallback when dispatcher unavailable)
curl -s -X POST http://100.91.113.16:11434/api/generate \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"qwen2.5-coder:7b","prompt":"<review prompt>","stream":false}'
Model Routing (G3 fleet-first)
Dispatch order: 36gbwinresource (100.91.113.16) → OpenClaw (100.78.22.13) → paid.
If all fleet nodes unavailable: record fleet_unavailable: true in handoff.
Do NOT substitute a same-family model. Defer if needed (G6 degradation).
Required Output Fields
COLLABORATOR_HANDOFF (L2)
cross_family_reviewer: qwen2.5-coder:[email protected]
cross_family_rating: <N>/100
reviewer_family: qwen
cross_family_findings: <findings>
CONSULTANT_CLOSEOUT (L4)
cross_family_verdict: ACCEPT|PARTIAL|REJECT — <model@host> — <rationale>
Advisory vs. Blocking
- L1, L5: advisory only (no CI gate).
- L2: advisory in current soak; CI hard-gate after Epic #2511 C3 promotion.
- L3: hard-gate via
admin-gateinbaton-gates.yml(reviewer_family_verified). - L4: advisory in current soak via
GATE_ADVISORY_MODE=1; promote to blocking by unsettingGATE_ADVISORY_MODEinbaton-gates.ymlconsultant-gate job.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 89 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A d0c49577756b
cross-family-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository chf3198/copilot-governance (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 893 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…