Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chf3198/copilot-governancenpx agentmods add skills/chf3198/copilot-governance/role-red-team-critiqueWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chf3198/copilot-governance/role-red-team-critique)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chf3198/copilot-governance/role-red-team-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chf3198/copilot-governance/role-red-team-critique/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chf3198/copilot-governance/role-red-team-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chf3198/copilot-governance/role-red-team-critique.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.01563 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00781 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00313 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00156 |
Grade A, and why
role-red-team-critique scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role: Red-Team Critique
Purpose
Red-Team critique provides an adversarial second opinion on baton artifacts and governance documents by routing to a cross-family fleet model. The cross-family invariant (non-Anthropic reviewer) eliminates same-family echo-chamber effects where the primary model overlooks its own blind spots.
This skill is the canonical umbrella over:
scripts/global/fleet-red-team-dispatch.js— HAMR-wrapped Ollama dispatcherscripts/global/baton-fleet-review-comment.js— structured comment formatterscripts/global/red-team-evidence-quality.js— validator for evidence blocks.claude/commands/fleet-review.md— slash command entry pointconfig/red-team-model-matrix.yml— A1 model-selection function
Dispatch Protocol
When to invoke
Red-Team is ADVISORY on all lanes. Invoke before posting the-collaborator-handoff
on tickets labeled area:governance, area:instructions, or area:scripts. For
lane:code-change touching deployed runtime artifacts, invoke before
the-admin-handoff. Invocation is always optional; skipping must be noted in
the-collaborator-handoff as red_team_review: skipped — <rationale>.
How to invoke
# High-stakes review (32B model, ~3-5 min)
node scripts/global/fleet-red-team-dispatch.js \
--artifact-type collaborator-handoff \
--ticket 2317 \
--model qwen2.5-coder:32b
# Fast fallback (7B model, ~30-60 sec)
node scripts/global/fleet-red-team-dispatch.js \
--artifact-type collaborator-handoff \
--ticket 2317 \
--model qwen2.5-coder:7b
Model selection at dispatch time uses config/red-team-model-matrix.yml via
selectModel(taskContext, opts) in fleet-red-team-dispatch.js. Pass
--stakes high to force 32B; omit for automatic selection per the matrix.
Cross-family invariant
The dispatched model MUST differ from the primary authoring model family. Claude Code sessions use Anthropic models; therefore all red-team dispatches MUST target Ollama-hosted models (Qwen, Llama, Mistral, etc.) or an OpenRouter non-Anthropic provider. Dispatching to another Claude model violates the cross-family rule and produces findings that must be discarded.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 153 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A 905fd6ee21ac
role-red-team-critique is a skill published in the GitHub repository chf3198/copilot-governance (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 1,563 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…